Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinicopathologic features of orbital meningioma. Methods A total of 27 patients with orbital meningioma admitted to Xi’an People’s Hospital from October 2015 to June 2021 were collected, the clinicopathological features of the patients were analyzed retrospectively, and relevant literatures were reviewed. Results The median age of 27 patients with orbital meningioma was 50 years old, with 11 cases occurring in the right orbit and 16 cases in the left orbit. Most clinical symptoms were mainly eye pain, bloating, unclear vision, and protruding eyeballs or eye masses. There were 17 cases of meningeal epithelial cell type, one case of fibrous type, five cases of transitional type, three cases of atypical, and one case of clear cell type. A total of 27 patients were followed up for 1-68 months after surgery, with an average of 18.5 months. Among them, four cases recurred and the rest recovered well. Immunohistochemical results showed that somatostatin receptor-2, progesterone receptor, vimentin, and epithelial membrane antigen were positive in all patients, extremely low molecular weight keratin CAM5.2 and glial fibrillary acidic protein were negative in all patients. There were 25 cases of D2-40 positive, two cases of S-100 focal positive. Ki-67 appreciation index was about 1%-2% in 24 cases and 3%-8% in three cases. Conclusion The histological morphology of primary orbital meningioma is mainly meningeal epithelial cell type. The markers of tumor-related antibodies somatostatin receptor-2, progesterone receptor, Vimentin, epithelial membrane antigen, and D2-40 are helpful for diagnosis.
王佳 蔡凤梅▲ 赵荧 张鸽 钱薇 李元朋 郅玲然 王卉芳. 眼眶脑膜瘤27例临床病理特征分析[J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(34): 105-110.
WANG Jia CAI Fengmei▲ ZHAO Ying ZHANG Ge QIAN Wei LI Yuanpeng ZHI Lingran WANG Huifang. Analysis of clinicopathological features of orbital meningioma in 27 cases. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(34): 105-110.
[1] Solli E,Turbin RE. Primary and Secondary Optic Nerve Sheath Meningioma [J]. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base,2021,82(1):27-71. [2] 宋晓涵,王丽君,于伟凡.MRI诊断眶内视神经鞘非典型脑膜瘤一例[J].磁共振成像,2022,13(9):106-107. [3] 沈筱梅,陈琴.眼眶异位脑膜瘤超声造影表现1例[J].中国超声医学杂志,2022,38(7):782-782. [5] 宋国祥,吴中耀,田文芳.原发眼眶脑膜瘤的诊断和治疗[J].眼科学报,1988,4(3):172-175. [5] Ostrom QT,Cioffi G,Gittleman H,et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2012-2016 [J]. Neuro Oncol,2019,21(Suppl 5):v1-v100. [6] Wiemels J,Wrensch M,Claus EB. Epidemiology and etiology of meningioma [J]. J Neurooncol,2010,99(3):307-314. [7] 李智.脑膜瘤的组织病理学诊断与鉴别诊断要点[J].广东医学,2017,38(24):3713-3719. [8] 黑砚,张新武,王毅,等.眼眶脑膜瘤组织病理学特征的观察[J].中华眼科杂志,2006,42(11):998-1001. [9] 郑莉梅,张声,王行富.第5版WHO中枢神经系统肿瘤分类脑膜瘤分类解读[J].中华病理学杂志,2023,52(2):107-111. [10] 任前浪,白刚,王浩楠,等.771例脑膜瘤流行病学分析[J].昆明医科大学学报,2023,44(2):161-165. [11] 申楠茜,张佳璇,甘桐嘉,等.2021年WHO中枢神经系统肿瘤分类概述[J].放射学实践,2021,36(7):818-831. [12] 张丽萌,李闰婷,聂晓宁,等.生长抑素Ⅱ型受体SSTR2蛋白的理化性质及生物信息学分析[J].广西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2023,41(1):101-111. [13] 侯俊芳,唐静,张海霞.雌激素受体,孕激素受体在子宫内膜癌中的表达及与临床特征和预后的关系[J].癌症进展,2021,19(18):1874-1877,1929. [14] Liu X,Liu J,Nai T,et al. Primary ectopic meningioma in the thoracic cavity:A rare case report and review of the literature [J]. Front Oncol,2023,13:1149627. [15] 胡力文,李国平,张声,等.特殊染色在分泌型脑膜瘤诊断中的应用[J].中华病理学杂志,2022,51(4):350-353. [16] Jin C,Hacking S,Sajjan S,et al. GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) as a marker for metaplastic spindle cell carcinoma of the breast [J]. Pathol Res Pract,2021,221:153413. [17] 高丽丽,李青.p16/Ki-67手工染色与全自动免疫组化仪染色效果对比[J].临床与实验病理学杂志,2022,38(1):113-114. [18] 贾红丽.不同特征系统性红斑狼疮血清抗可提取性核抗原、抗细胞膜DNA抗体水平表达及诊断价值[J].河南医学研究,2021,30(9):1704-1706. [19] 巫永志,张琴琴,孙国敏,等.浅表性CD34阳性纤维母细胞瘤1例并文献复习[J].临床与病理杂志,2022,42(6):1496-1504. [20] 高平,向清明,杨易,等.不同级别脑膜瘤的临床病理特征和PR、ER、AR的表达差异分析[J].中国医药导报,2021,18(22):17-21,封4. [21] 王倩,罗含欢,廖瑞倩,等.D2-40、生长抑素受体2在藏族人群脑膜瘤中的表达情况及诊断意义[J].高原科学研究,2022,6(1):56-62. [22] 王壮壮,刘彦廷,艾文兵,等.脑膜瘤临床特点和预后影响因素分析[J].中国现代医药杂志,2022,24(7):1-6. [23] 刘禄,杨娜,刘智,等.探讨脑膜瘤临床病理特征(附162例临床病理特征分析[J].临床医药实践,2019,28(6):450-453. [24] 张立英,祁晓莉,许春伟.分泌型脑膜瘤5例临床病理分析[J].临床与病理杂志,2021,41(5):1220-1226. [25] 李国强,罗玉红,余跃,等.非典型性脑膜瘤复发率及其影响因素的Meta分析[J].中国医学科学院学报,2022, 44(4):570-578.