腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后低位前切除综合征发生风险分析
黄俊杰1 郑惟青1 汪朝晖2 任俭1▲
1.安徽省黄山市人民医院胃肠外科,安徽黄山 245000;
2.安徽省安庆市第一人民医院胃肠外科,安徽安庆 246004
Risk analysis of low anterior resection syndrome after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer
HUANG Junjie1 ZHENG Weiqing1 WANG Zhaohui2 REN Jian1▲
1.Department of Gastroenterology, Huangshan People’s Hospital, Anhui Province, Huangshan 245000, China;
2.Department of Gastroenterology, Anqing First People’s Hospital, Anhui Province, Anqing 246004, China
摘要 目的 分析腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后低位前切除综合征(LARS)发生风险。 方法 选取安徽省黄山市人民医院2017年6月至2020年1月行腹腔镜直肠癌根治术并完成术后随访24个月的80例直肠癌患者为研究对象。根据术后患者是否发生LARS将其分为LARS组和非LARS组。收集患者临床资料,分析可能影响腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后患者发生LARS的相关因素,采用logistic回归分析法明确危险因素。结果 80例患者随访24个月,发生LARS患者49例(61.25%)为LARS组,未发生LARS患者有31例(38.75%)为非LARS组。单因素分析显示,LARS组吻合口距肛门距离较非LARS组更短(P<0.05),LARS组体重指数(BMI)>25 kg/cm2占比较非LARS组更高(P<0.05)。logistic回归分析显示,BMI>25 kg/cm2(OR=2.385,95%CI:1.875,2.895)、吻合口距肛门距离(OR=0.321,95%CI:-0.381,1.023)均是行腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的直肠癌患者发生LARS的影响因素(P<0.05)。 结论 BMI与吻合口距肛门距离均是直肠癌患者术后LARS的影响因素,LARS发生风险较高。识别危险因素,有助于临床选择科学手术方式,降低LARS发生率。
关键词 :
腹腔镜 ,
直肠癌 ,
根治术 ,
低位前切除综合征 ,
危险因素
Abstract :Objective To analyze the risk of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. Methods A total of 80 patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer in Huangshan People’s Hospital Anhui Province from June 2017 to January 2020 and were followed up for 24 months were selected as the study subjects. Patients were divided into LARS group and non-LARS group according to whether or not occurred LARS after surgery. Clinical data of patients were collected to analyze the related factors that may affect the occurrence of LARS in patients after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer, and the risk factors were identified by logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 80 patients followed up for 24 months, 49 (61.25%) of the patients with LARS were the LARS group, and 31 (38.75%) of the patients without LARS were the non-LARS group. Univariate analysis showed that the anastomotic distance from stamo to anus in the LARS group was shorter than the non-LARS group (P<0.05), and the proportion of body mass index (BMI)>25 kg/cm2 in the LARS group was higher than that in the non-LARS group (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that BMI>25 kg/cm2 (OR=2.385, 95%CI: 1.875, 2.895), anastomotic distance from the anus (OR=0.321, 95%CI:-0.381, 1.023) were risk factors for LARS in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer (P<0.05). Conclusion BMI and the anastomotic distance from stoma to anus are important influencing factors for LARS in patients with rectal cancer after operation, and the risk of LARS is high. Identifying risk factors is helpful for clinical selection of scientific surgical methods and reduction of LARS incidence.
Key words :
Laparoscopy
Rectal cancer
Radical surgery
Low anterior resection syndrome
Risk factors
基金资助: 安徽省科学技术厅重点研究与开发计划项目(2022e07020053)。
通讯作者:
▲通讯作者
[1] 韩方海,钟广宇.直肠癌全直肠系膜切除手术中保护盆腔自主神经的技术路径[J].临床外科杂志,2020,28(5):412-415.
[2] 蔡建,王磊.回眸2018——聚焦结直肠癌研究领域[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2019,22(1):9-16.
[3] Li J,Xiong Y,Yang G,et al. Complete laparoscopic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: technical aspects and long-term results from a single center [J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne,2021,16(1):62-75.
[4] 理纪,周世云.低位直肠癌患者腹腔镜辅助经肛全直肠系膜切除术术后排便功能观察及其相关影响因素分析[J].实用癌症杂志,2022,37(3):471-473.
[5] 樊鹏,徐红丽,王凯,等.腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术治疗结直肠癌的临床效果及其对胃肠功能的影响[J].中国医药科学,2021,11(12):170-173.
[6] Keane C,Fearnhead NS,Bordeianou LG,et al. LARS International Collaborative Group. International Consensus Definition of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome [J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2020,63(3):274-284.
[7] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2020年版)[J].中华外科杂志,2020,58(8):561- 585.
[8] 马明星,丛进春,陈春生,等.低位直肠癌经内外括约肌间切除术后的低前综合征评分[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2016,23(10):1225-1230.
[9] 夏志刚,甘志明,向立历,等.NLR和PLR与结直肠癌患者TNM分期及预后的相关性研究[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2017,24(8):963-969.
[10] Stanzione A,Verde F,Romeo V,et al. Radiomics and machine learning applications in rectal cancer: Current update and future perspectives [J]. World J Gastroenterol,2021,27(32):5306-5321.
[11] 周仕海,陈宏,雒洪志.腹腔镜直肠癌根治术保留左结肠动脉的安全性及近期疗效评价[J].中国医药科学,2022, 12(10):144-148.
[12] Nicotera A,Falletto E,Arezzo A,et al. Risk factors for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer [J]. Surg Endosc,2022,36(8):6059-6066.
[13] 陈艳玲,黄玉莲,罗琳,等.直肠癌切除术患者永久性与临时性造口术后生活质量变化及其与排便症状的相关性研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2021,21(18):3559- 3563,3519.
[14] 高庚妹,陈兰,唐和春,等.机器人与腹腔镜直肠癌根治术治疗超重和肥胖患者的疗效对比分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2021,24(1):68-74.
[15] 侯文运,肖毅.对中低位直肠癌根治手术中“困难骨盆”的认识和思考[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2022,25(3):214- 218.
[16] 吴胜伟,吴晓翔,王志伟.保留盆腔自主神经的腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术对女性直肠癌患者术后复发及排尿和性生活质量的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2022,39(6):519-522.
[17] 杨丹,李丽,邵丽.腹腔镜下系统保留盆腔自主神经的直肠癌根治术的近期疗效及对患者术后排尿、胃肠功能影响[J].实用癌症杂志,2020,35(5):819-824.
[18] 许博,张颖.基于肛门直肠测压探究功能性磁刺激对脊髓损伤后神经源性肠道的改善效果[J].国际生物医学工程杂志,2021,44(4):286-290.
[19] Melka D,Leiritz E,Labiad C,et al. Delayed pull-through coloanal anastomosis without temporary stoma: an alternative to the standard manual side-to-end coloanal anastomosis with temporary stoma? A comparative study in 223 patients with low rectal cancer [J]. Colorectal Dis,2022,24(5):587-593.
[20] 郭贞.微创腹腔镜低位直肠癌保肛术后导致吻合口瘘的原因分析与预防措施[J].实用癌症杂志,2019,34(4):661-664.
[21] Sürek A,Bozkurt MA,Gemici E,et al. Treatment of Anastomotic Leaks With EndoVac After Low Anterior Resection in Colorectal Cancers [J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2021,31(4):492-496.
[22] 刘帅峰,李文献,梅志彪,等.结肠癌根治术吻合口瘘并发腹腔感染引流液病原菌分布、耐药性及风险预测模型建立[J].实用癌症杂志,2022,37(7):1128-1132.
[23] Sandberg S,Asplund D,Bisgaard T,et al. Low anterior resection syndrome in a Scandinavian population of patients with rectal cancer:a longitudinal follow-up within the QoLiRECT study[J]. Colorectal Dis,2020,22(10):1367- 1378.
[24] 金鑫,黄勇,刘维高.保留左结肠动脉对直肠癌腹腔镜根治术患者排尿和排便影响的meta分析[J].重庆医学,2021,50(20):3536-3540.
[25] 徐晓华,吴霞,李可欣,等.张青教授基于“肺与大肠相表里”的直肠癌前切除综合征的治疗经验[J].世界中医药,2019,14(12):3329-3332.
[26] 龚熙,陆叶青,吴秀芳,等.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者并发症影响因素分析[J].中国医药导报,2023,20(17):123-126.
[27] 黄海霞,杨邦翠,范雨诗.直肠癌术后低位前切除综合征的研究进展[J].中国医药科学,2021,11(20):46-49.
[1]
任燕珍 李蕊仙. 人表皮生长因子受体在转移性结直肠癌中的研究进展 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(8): 58-61.
[2]
李芬1 李明霞2▲ 黄召慧1 周春梅1. ADOPT模式联合团体干预在直肠癌结肠造口患者中的管理效果 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(8): 180-183.
[3]
王娜 周玲玲 侯彤. 多媒体视频联合情景体验式健康教育在腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术患者中的应用效果 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(6): 149-152.
[4]
韦文萍1 谢斌2 朱平1. 基于自我超越理论的干预策略对结直肠癌化疗患者心理痛苦及应对方式的影响 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(6): 161-164,176.
[5]
王玉婷 王安琪 李志利 吕政融 黄楚月 樊志敏. 基于外泌体miRNA靶向诊疗结直肠癌的研究进展 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(5): 47-50.
[6]
黄晟 俞隼 汪易岚 许春阳▲. 急性中度呼吸衰竭经鼻高流量氧疗治疗失败患者的影响因素 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(5): 120-123.
[7]
王静 王洁. 脑氧饱和度监测目标导向管理对老年全麻下腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后早期认知功能的影响 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(4): 120-123.
[8]
宁小娟1 刘当当2▲. 基于规范化疼痛评估干预在直肠癌晚期疼痛患者中的临床效果 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(4): 185-188,192.
[9]
王思琦1 高瞻2 王忠2 褚一凡1 王浩1 王建文1▲. 中医药治疗前列腺癌根治术后尿失禁的研究进展 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(24): 56-58,68.
[10]
宋思霖 杨希澜▲. 基于Neuman理论的护理干预联合提肛肌锻炼在前列腺癌术后患者中的应用 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(24): 169-173.
[11]
葛一凡 杨红生 梅广红 王凤 陈秋香. 结直肠癌永久性肠造口患者自我接受度、病耻感及负性情绪调查分析 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(21): 62-66.
[12]
王新俊1 黄伊鑫2. TIMP1基因表达与结直肠癌预后及免疫浸润相关性研究 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(2): 30-34.
[13]
吴淋淋1 徐浩2▲ 李池慧3. 盆腔粘连松解术及输卵管伞端造口术治疗盆腔炎致不孕症的效果 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(2): 76-79.
[14]
陈德忠 常剑 王璋瑜. 保留左结肠动脉对直肠癌腹腔镜D3根治术后胃肠、肛门功能的影响 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(2): 101-104.
[15]
吴玉敏1 阎文军2 屈松1 张文洁1. 静脉输注利多卡因在结直肠癌患者全身麻醉中应用的研究进展 [J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(17): 45-48.