Comparison of the effect of bone transport and Masquelet induced membrane technique in the treatment of long bone infection combined with large segment bone defect
ZHOU Wanmiao DENG Xueyun GUO Xu
Department of Orthopedics, the Second Hospital of Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province, Zhangjiakou 075000, China
Abstract：Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect of bone transport and Masquelet induced membrane technique in the treatment of long bone infection combined with large segmental bone defect. Methods Forty patients with long bone infection combined with large segment bone defect admitted to the Second Hospital of Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province from January 2017 to January 2020 were selected as the research objects, and they were divided into observation group (Masquelet induced membrane technique, 20 cases) and control group (bone transport, 20 cases) according to random number table method. The therapeutic effect, number of operations, clinical healing time, full weight-bearing time of lower limbs, treatment cost, and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, Fereadez-Esteve calluses score, Iowa score were compared between the two groups. Complications were recorded in the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in treatment effect between the two groups (P＞0.05). The number of operations, and treatment cost in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, clinical healing time, full weight-bearing time of lower limbs in the observation were shorter than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). The VAS score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, and the of Fereadez-Esteve calluses score, and knee, ankle joints scores of Iowa score were higher than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion Masquelet induced membrane technique can effectively accelerate the postoperative recovery of patients with long bone infection combined with large segment bone defect.
周万淼 邓雪云 郭旭. 骨搬运与Masquelet诱导膜技术治疗长骨感染合并大段骨缺损的效果比较[J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(12): 107-110.
ZHOU Wanmiao DENG Xueyun GUO Xu. Comparison of the effect of bone transport and Masquelet induced membrane technique in the treatment of long bone infection combined with large segment bone defect. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(12): 107-110.
[1] 郭卫，梁海杰，杨毅，等.仿生肿瘤型膝关节假体重建儿童股骨远端骨肉瘤切除后骨缺损[J].中华骨科杂志，2021， 41（4）：201-210.
[2] 周帅，高顺红，董惠双，等.骨搬移术治疗尺桡骨感染性骨缺损的疗效观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志，2021，36（9）：923-925.
[3] Zhang T，Wei Q，Zhou H，et al. Three-dimensional-printed individualized porous implants：A new“implant-bone”interface fusion concept for large bone defect treatment [J]. Bioact Mater，2021，6（11）：3659-3670.
[4] 胡居正，石展英，杨成志，等.骨搬移后对合端植骨内固定治疗下肢大段骨缺损的临床研究[J].中华骨科杂志，2018，38（5）：280-287.
[5] 唐辉，徐永清，李春晓，等.Ilizarov骨搬运技术结合病灶截骨治疗cierny-Mader Ⅳ型慢性胫骨骨髓炎[J].中华创伤骨科杂志，2018，20（2）：105-111.
[6] 刘彬，王超，王新光，等.Ilizarov骨搬移联合髓内引导针技术治疗胫骨创伤性骨缺损的疗效[J].中华创伤杂志，2020，36（4）：321-326.
[7] Borzunov DY，Kolchin SN，Mokhovikov DS，et al. Ilizarov bone transport combined with the Masquelet technique for bone defects of various etiologies（preliminary results）[J]. World J Orthop，2022，13（3）：278-288.
[8] Litvina EA，Semenistyy AA. A case report of extensive segmental defect of the humerus treated with Masquelet technique [J]. J Shoulder Elb Surg，2020，29（7）：1368-1374.
[9] 中华医学会骨科学分会创伤骨科学组，中华医学会骨科学分会外固定与肢体重建学组，中国医师协会创伤外科医师分会创伤感染专家委员会，等.中国骨折内固定术后感染诊断与治疗专家共识（2018版）[J].中华创伤骨科杂志，2018，20（11）：929-936.
[10] 中国医师协会骨科医师分会显微修复工作委员会，中国康复医学会修复重建外科专业委员会骨缺损及骨坏死学组.胫骨骨缺损循证临床诊疗指南（2016年版）[J].中华显微外科杂志，2016，39（6）：521-523.
[11] Paley D，Herzenberg JE，Paremain G，et al. Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail.A matched-case comparison with Ilizarov femoral lengthening [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am，1997，79（10）：1464-1480.
[12] 毕菲，蔡振媛.关节持续被动活动机训练联合综合康复治疗在下肢骨折后膝关节活动功能障碍患者中的应用效果[J].中国医药导报，2022，19（3）：79-82.
[13] 杨思宇，汤明，汪国栋，等.髓内钉附加钢板与单纯髓内钉固定治疗股骨转子下骨不连的临床效果对比[J].创伤外科杂志，2021，23（7）：497-501，506.
[14] 贾鹏，王宏川，石博文，等.环形外固定架与髓内钉治疗胫骨节段性骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤杂志，2021， 37（9）：818-824.
[15] 陈胡贵，覃建国，李理，等.大动物节段性骨缺损模型的研究进展[J].北京生物医学工程，2021，40（2）：203-208.
[16] 徐永清，范新宇.Ilizarov技术和Masquelet技术在长骨大段骨缺损治疗中的应用比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志，2019， 21（8）：733-736.
[17] 时培晟，张瑜，樊晓海，等.分期手术治疗胫骨慢性感染性骨缺损[J].中国矫形外科杂志，2021，29（21）：2001- 2004.
[18] 孙守野，李少荣，崔宇韬，等.生物矿化胶原在骨缺损治疗中的研究及应用现状[J].北京生物医学工程，2022， 41（4）：429-435.
[19] Li R，Zeng C，Yuan S，et al. Free flap transplantation combined with Ilizarov bone transport for the treatment of severe composite tibial and soft tissue defects [J]. J Int Med Res，2021，49（5）：277-281.
[20] 丁强，孙楠，张烔，等.Masquelet诱导膜技术治疗感染性骨缺损的疗效观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志，2017， 32（7）：775-776.
[21] 李海峰，顾三军，芮永军，等.诱导膜技术修复骨缺损研究现状及应用方法的改进[J].中国组织工程研究，2019， 23（30）：4855-4860.
[22] 王钊，闫石.应用Masquelet技术治疗大段骨缺损减少自体骨用量的可能性[J].中国组织工程研究，2020，24（24）：3862-3869.
[23] 韩天宇，纪振钢，张昊，等.膜诱导技术治疗肢体肿瘤切除后骨干缺损的初期疗效分析[J].骨科，2020，11（4）：287-292.
[24] 李卓伟，高峻青，王朝辉，等.诱导膜技术联合双钢板治疗胫骨骨干大段骨缺损[J].中国矫形外科杂志，2022， 30（8）：737-740.
[25] 王建兵，顾三军，周子红，等.骨搬运与诱导膜技术修复胫骨大段骨缺损的疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志，2019， 21（5）：398-404.
[26] Yo A，Ty B，Ao B. Ankle arthrodesis using a modified Masquelet induced membrane technique for open ankle fracture with a substantial osteochondral defect：A case report of novel surgical technique-Science Direct [J]. Injury，2019，50（11）：2128-2135.
[27] 耿磊，程前勇，董志远.Masquelet术与Ilizarov骨搬移术治疗感染性骨缺损的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志，2019，34（10）：1094-1096.
京公网安备 11010502046598号