改良HB系数法指导的营养支持疗法对重症颅脑损伤患者预后的影响

doi:10.20047/j.issn1673-7210.2023.05.25

摘要
图/表
参考文献(25)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1191 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨改良Harris-Benedict（HB）系数法指导的营养支持治疗对重症颅脑损伤（TBI）患者预后的影响。方法选择2019年9月至2022年6月南京医科大学第一附属医院神经外科、南京医科大学第四附属医院及南京医科大学附属鼓楼医院重症监护病房颅脑损伤的患者87例，并以间接能量测定（IC）法及HB法监测患者的静息能量消耗（REE），并分析两种方法的差异性及相关性，得出两者的线性回归方程（即改良HB系数法公式）。进一步对得到的改良HB系数法公式进行验证，另选取南京医科大学第四附属医院2022年6月至9月入院的40例重型颅脑损伤患者按照随机数字表法分为IC组和改良HB系数法组，比较两组预后指标。结果颅脑损伤患者在营养支持治疗的2周内分别使用IC及HB系数法测算患者REE各316次，经比较IC所得REE数值明显高于HB系数法（P＜0.05）；基于IC法改良的HB系数回归方程式为：Y = 0.68X+767.67（单位：kJ/d，X为重症颅脑损伤患者HB系数法计算的REE）。改良HB系数法组与IC法组预后指标比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论对于重度TBI患者，HB系数法明显低估了患者的能量消耗，通过IC法改良的HB系数法能够较准确地估算重症颅脑损伤患者的能量消耗，为临床提供准确简便的营养支持指导。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	高田1 王巍1 顾勤2 黄培赞1 王玲1 王丹1 王慧博3 李海林4

关键词 ：颅脑损伤, 能量代谢, HB系数法, 间接测热法

Abstract：Objective To investigate the effect of nutritional target support therapy with modified Harris-Benedict (HB) coefficient on the prognosis of patients with severe craniocerebral injury (TBI). Methods A total of 87 severe TBI patients admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, the Intensive Care Unit the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University and the Gulou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from September 2019 to June 2022 were selected. Resting energy expenditure (REE) was measured by respiratory indirect calorimetry (IC) method and HB method of nutritional support. The difference and correlation between the two methods were analyzed, and the linear regression equation of the two methods was obtained (namely improved HB coefficient method formula). In addition, 40 severe TBI patients admitted to the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from June 2022 to September were selected and they were divided into IC group and modified HB coefficient method group according to the random number table method, and the prognostic indicators of the two groups were compared. Results The REE values of severe TBI patients were measured by IC and HB coefficient method 316 times respectively within two weeks of nutritional support treatment. The REE values obtained by IC method were significantly higher than those obtained by HB coefficient method (P＜0.05); the modified HB coefficient regression equation based on IC method was Y = 0.68X+767.67 (unit: kJ/d, X was the REE calculated by HB coefficient method of severe TBI patients ). There was no significant difference in the the modified HB coefficient method group and IC method group (P＞0.05). Conclusion The HB coefficient method significantly underestimated the energy expenditure of severe TBI patients within two weeks of the course of the disease. The modified HB coefficient method by IC method can more accurately estimate the energy expenditure of severe TBI patients, and provide accurate and simple nutritional support for clinical practice.

Key words： Craniosynostosis Energy metabolism HB coefficient Indirect calorimetry

基金资助:国家自然科学基金面上项目（82072783）。

通讯作者: 李海林（1971.6-），男，博士，副主任医师；研究方向：神经创伤与重症。

作者简介: 高田（1989.10-），女，硕士；研究方向：神经创伤与重症。

引用本文:

高田1 王巍1 顾勤2 黄培赞1 王玲1 王丹1 王慧博3 李海林4 . 改良HB系数法指导的营养支持疗法对重症颅脑损伤患者预后的影响[J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(5): 106-110.
GAO Tian1 WANG Wei1 GU Qin2 HUANG Peizan1 WANG Ling1 WANG Dan1 WANG Huibo3 LI Hailin4. Effect of nutritional target support therapy with modified HB coefficient on the prognosis of patients with severe craniocerebral injury. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(5): 106-110.

链接本文:

https://www.yiyaodaobao.com.cn/CN/10.20047/j.issn1673-7210.2023.05.25 或 https://www.yiyaodaobao.com.cn/CN/Y2023/V20/I5/106

[1] Cash A，Theus MH. Mechanisms of Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction in Traumatic Brain Injury [J]. Int J Mol Sci，2020， 21（9）：3344.
[2] Jin T，Lian W，Xu K，et al. Effect of combination invasive intracranial pressure （ICP） monitoring and transcranial Doppler in the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury patients with decompressive craniectomy [J]. Ann Palliat Med，2021，10（4）：4472-4478.
[3] Khatri N，Thakur M，Pareek V，et al. Oxidative Stress：Major Threat in Traumatic Brain Injury [J]. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets，2018，17（9）：689-695.
[4] Ladak AA，Enam SA，Ibrahim MT. A Review of the Molecular Mechanisms of Traumatic Brain Injury [J]. World Neurosurg，2019，131：126-132.
[5] Du T，Jing X，Song S，et al. Therapeutic Effect of Enteral Nutrition Supplemented with Probiotics in the Treatment of Severe Craniocerebral Injury：A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J]. World Neurosurgery，2020，139：e553- e571.
[6] Hanscom M，Loane DJ，Shea-Donohue T. Brain-gut axis dysfunction in the pathogenesis of traumatic brain injury [J]. J Clin Invest，2021，131（12）：e143777.
[7] Moonen HPFX，Beckers KJH，van Zanten ARH. Energy expenditure and indirect calorimetry in critical illness and convalescence current evidence and practical considerations [J]. J Intensive Care，2021，9（1）：8.
[8] Wischmeyer PE，Molinger J，Haines K. Point-Counterpoint：Indirect Calorimetry Is Essential for Optimal Nutrition Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit [J]. Nutr Clin Pract，2021，36（2）：275-281.
[9] 王丽娟，赵兰菊，杨小娟，等.间接测热法与HB公式法测定多发伤机械通气患者能量消耗的一致性研究[J].中华危重病急救医学，2018，30（10）：946-949.
[10] De Waele E，Jonckheer J，Wischmeyer PE. Indirect calorimetry in critical illness：a new standard of care? [J]. Curr Opin Crit Care，2021，27（4）：334-343.
[11] Robinson CP. Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury [J]. Continuum （Minneap Minn），2021，27（5）：1278-1300.
[12] Oliveira ACDS，de Oliveira CC，de Jesus MT，et al. Comparison of Equations to Predict Energy Requirements With Indirect Calorimetry in Hospitalized Patients [J]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr，2021，45（7）：1491-1497.
[13] 高明，周华，朱研，等.间接测热法与预测公式对肝脏术后患者能量消耗评估的差异性分析[J].临床急诊杂志，2021，22（1）：4.
[14] 卓缘圆，王鑫茹，黄聪聪，等.脑梗死和脑出血1年复发风险比较和危险因素分析[J].中国医药导报，2022，19（23）：74-78.
[15] 李娅，李辉凤，王铭，等.严重创伤并发持续炎症-免疫抑制-分解代谢综合征的研究进展[J].中国急救医学，2021，41（4）：5.
[16] LoBue C，Munro C，Schaffert J，et al. Traumatic Brain Injury and Risk of Long-Term Brain Changes， Accumulation of Pathological Markers，and Developing Dementia：A Review [J]. J Alzheimers Dis，2019，70（3）：629-654.
[17] Wang H，He Y，Liang R，et al. A meta-analysis and systematic review of intracranial pressure monitoring on severe craniocerebral injury [J]. Ann Palliat Med，2021，10（5）：5380-5390.
[18] Cook AM，Peppard A，Magnuson B. Nutrition Considerations in Traumatic Brain Injury [J]. Nutrition in clinical practice，2008，23（6）：608-620.
[19] Killen MJ，Giorgi-Coll S，Helmy A，et al. Metabolism and inflammation： implications for traumatic brain injury therapeutics [J]. Expert Rev Neurother，2019，19（3）：227-242.
[20] Kolb H，Kempf K，R?觟hling M，et al. Ketone bodies：from enemy to friend and guardian angel [J]. BMC Med，2021，19（1）：313.
[21] Chapple LS，Weinel L，Ridley EJ，et al. Clinical Sequelae From Overfeeding in Enterally Fed Critically Ill Adults： Where Is the Evidence? [J]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr，2019，44（6）：980-991.
[22] Duan JY，Zheng WH，Zhou H，et al. Energy delivery guided by indirect calorimetry in critically ill patients：a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Crit Care，2021，25（1）：88.
[23] Taylor BE，McClave SA，Martindale RG，et al. Society of Critical Care Medicine; American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient：Society of Critical Care Medicine（SCCM）and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition （A.S.P.E.N.） [J]. Crit Care Med，2016，44（2）：390-438.
[24] Smetana KS，Hannawi Y，May CC. Indirect Calorimetry Measurements Compared With Guideline Weight-Based Energy Calculations in Critically Ill Stroke Patients [J]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr，2021，45（7）：1484-1490.
[25] Wu S，Iqbal S，Giroux M，et al. Penn State equation versus indirect calorimetry for nutritional assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury [J]. Can J Surg，2022，65（3）：E320-E325.