Research progress in the application status and cost-benefit analysis of fracture liaison services in osteoporotic fractures
WANG Qiaona1 HUANG Qiuhuan2▲ LIU Jia3 LU Liuxue2 ZHOU Landao3 WEI Suyu2
1.College of Nursing，Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Baise 533000,China;
2.Department of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Baise 533000, China; 3.Department of Spine Arthroplasty, Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Baise 533000, China
Abstract：The aging society inevitably increases the incidence of osteoporotic fractures (OPF). OPF with a high risk of secondary fractures and cost of treatment, which seriously threatens the life and property safety of the elderly. However, the number of patients with timely diagnosis of osteoporosis and standardized treatment is still minority. Fracture liaison service (FLS) is an osteoporotic fracture management model advocated and promoted in worldwide by the International Osteoporosis Foundation, which expected to improve the rate of diagnosis, treatment initiation and OPF patients, treatment compliance. It is still in its infancy in China, there are few related studies. But FLS as a high-intensity OPF management model, the high cost may be as an obstacle to the implementation of FLS. The cost-effectiveness of FLS has been extensively studied abroad. This article reviews the application status and cost-effectiveness of FLS in management of osteoporotic fractures aim to provides a reference for the development and promotion of FLS in China.
王巧娜1 黄秋环2▲ 刘佳3 陆柳雪2 周兰岛3 韦素雨2. 骨折联络服务在骨质疏松性骨折中的应用现状及成本效益分析的研究进展[J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(4): 35-38,51.
WANG Qiaona1 HUANG Qiuhuan2▲ LIU Jia3 LU Liuxue2 ZHOU Landao3 WEI Suyu2. Research progress in the application status and cost-benefit analysis of fracture liaison services in osteoporotic fractures. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(4): 35-38,51.
[1] Consensus development conference：diagnosis，prophylaxis，and treatment of osteoporosis [J]. Am J Med，1993，94（6）：646-650.
[2] 中华医学会骨科学分会骨质疏松学组.骨质疏松性骨折诊疗指南[J].中华骨科杂志，2017，37（1）：1-10.
[3] National Osteoporosis Foundation National Bone Health Policy. New report on burden of osteoporosis highlights huge and growing economic and human toll of the disease [EB/QB]. （2019-11-12）.
[4] Mclellan AR，Gallacher SJ，Fraser M，et al. The fracture liaison service：success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture [J]. Osteoporos Int，2003，14（12）：1028-1034.
[5] Compston J. Reducing the treatment gap in osteoporosis [J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol，2020，8（1）：7-9.
[6] Li N，Hiligsmann M，Boonen A，et al. The impact of fracture liaison services on subsequent fractures and mortality：a systematic literature review and meta-analysis [J]. Osteoporos Int，2021，32（8）：1517-1530.
[7] Akesson K，Marsh D，Mitchell PJ，et al. Capture the Fracture：a Best Practice Framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle [J]. Osteoporos Int，2013，24（8）：2135-2152.
[8] Javaid MK，Kyer C，Mitchell PJ，et al. Effective secondary fracture prevention：implementation of a global benchmarking of clinical quality using the IOF Capture the Fracture? Best Practice Framework tool [J]. Osteoporos Int，2015，26（11）：2573-2578.
[9] Chan DD，Chang LY，Akesson KE，et al. Consensus on best practice standards for Fracture Liaison Service in the Asia-Pacific region [J]. Arch Osteoporos，2018，13（1）：59.
[10] Beaupre LA，Lier D，Smith C，et al. A 3i hip fracture liaison service with nurse and physician co-management is cost-effective when implemented as a standard clinical program [J]. Arch Osteoporos，2020，15（1）：113.
[11] Gonzalez-Quevedo D，Perez-Del-Rio V，Moriel-Garceso D，et al. A 2-year follow-up of a novel Fracture Liaison Service：can we reduce the mortality in elderly hip fracture patients? A prospective cohort study [J]. Osteoporos Int，2022， 33（8）：1695-1702.
[12] Hung WC，Yang CH，Cheng WL，et al. Revisit three “I” model：a novel five “I” model of fracture liaison service [J]. Osteoporos Int，2019，30（11）：2361-2362.
[13] Axelsson KF，Jacobsson R，Lund D，et al. Effectiveness of a minimal resource fracture liaison service [J]. Osteoporos Int，2016，27（11）：3165-3175.
[14] 赵媛，彭贵凌.以专科护士为主导的骨折联络服务在老年髋部骨折患者中的实施效果观察[J].中国护理管理，2020，20（12）：1893-1897.
[15] Pinedo-Villanueva R，Charokopou M，Toth E，et al. Imminent fracture risk assessments in the UK FLS setting：implications and challenges [J]. Arch Osteoporos，2019，14（1）：12.
[16] Wu CH，Tu ST，Chang YF，et al. Fracture liaison services improve outcomes of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures：A systematic literature review and meta-analysis [J]. Bone，2018，111：92-100.
[17] Hawley S，Javaid MK，Prieto-Alhambra D，et al. Clinical effectiveness of orthogeriatric and fracture liaison service models of care for hip fracture patients：population-based longitudinal study [J]. Age Ageing，2016，45（2）：236-242.
[18] Naranjo A，Ojeda S，Giner M，et al. Best Practice Framework of Fracture Liaison Services in Spain and their coordination with Primary Care [J]. Arch Osteoporos，2020，15（1）：63.
[19] Fraser S，Wong PK. Secondary fracture prevention needs to happen in the country too：The first two and a half years of the Coffs Fracture Prevention Clinic [J]. Aust J Rural Health，2017，25（1）：28-33.
[20] Si L，Winzenberg TM，Jiang Q，et al. Projection of osteoporosis-related fractures and costs in China：2010-2050 [J]. Osteoporos Int，2015，26（7）：1929-1937.
[21] Chang LY，Tsai KS，Peng JK，et al. The development of Taiwan Fracture Liaison Service network [J]. Osteoporos Sarcopenia，2018，4（2）：47-52.
[22] 肖恩，邓忠良，李毅中，等.骨质疏松骨折二级预防之骨折联络员模式探讨华南/华西区骨科专家研讨会议纪要[J].中华关节外科杂志（电子版），2015（5）：673-675.
[23] 李宁，杨明辉，李新萍，等.老年髋部骨折中“骨折联络服务”的初步临床效果[J].骨科临床与研究杂志，2017， 2（5）：287-292.
[24] 罗兰，刘朝露，方茜，等.骨折联络服务模式在骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者中的应用[J].中华创伤杂志，2019， 35（12）：1120-1125.
[25] 刘春香，成传芳，赵晨，等.骨折联络服务在老年髋部脆性骨折患者中的应用[J].中华护理杂志，2019，54（9）：1343-1348.
[26] 张萍霞，倪艳，郑珺，等.适度运动疗法及骨折联络服务在骨质疏松性髋部骨折中的应用效果[J].中国实用护理杂志，2021，37（30）：2335-2339.
[27] 甘玉云，刘静，徐丽，等.基于骨折联络服务模式的老年髋部脆性骨折患者综合护理干预效果研究[J].解放军护理杂志，2021，38（9）：67-70.
[28] Cha YH，Ha YC，Lim JY，et al. Introduction of the Cost- Effectiveness Studies of Fracture Liaison Service in Other Countries [J]. J Bone Metab，2020，27（2）：79-83.
[29] Mclellan AR，Wolowacz SE，Zimovetz EA，et al. Fracture liaison services for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture：a cost-effectiveness evaluation based on data collected over 8 years of service provision [J]. Osteoporos Int，2011，22（7）：2083-2098.
[30] Solomon DH，Patrick AR，Schousboe J，et al. The potential economic benefits of improved postfracture care：a cost-effectiveness analysis of a fracture liaison service in the US health-care system [J]. J Bone Miner Res，2014，29（7）：1667-1674.
[31] Major G，Ling R，Searles A，et al. The Costs of Confronting Osteoporosis：Cost Study of an Australian Fracture Liaison Service [J]. JBMR Plus，2019，3（1）：56-63.
[32] Chien LN，Li YF，Yang RS，et al. Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of the fracture liaison services model of care for hip fracture in Taiwan [J]. J Formos Med Assoc，2022，121（1 Pt 2）：425-433.
[33] Wang X，Li C，He Y，et al. Anti-osteoporosis medication treatment pattern after osteoporotic fracture during 2010- 2016 in Fujian，China [J]. Arch Osteoporos，2020，15（1）：134.
[34] 龚秀全，孙晨晗.我国分级诊疗模式是否能节约医疗资源[J].南方经济，2021（5）：34-51.
[35] 医政医管局.国家卫生健康委办公厅关于开展老年医疗护理服务试点工作的通知[EB/QB].（2021-11-22）.
[36] 樊晓奇，刘娟，谢红珍，等.骨科专科护士岗位管理现状的调查[J].中华护理杂志，2020，55（8）：1223-1228.
京公网安备 11010502046598号