Correlation between hope level and attribution mode of patients with advanced breast cancer after breast-conserving chemotherapy#br#
XIANG Yanjun1 TAN Mingying1▲ ZHANG Zhengfang2 PAN Wei3
1.Department of Outpatient, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610041, China;
2.Department of Head and Neck Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610041, China;
3.Disinfection Supply Center, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610041, China
Abstract：Objective To explore the relationship between the level of hope and the attribution mode of patients with advanced breast cancer after breast-conserving chemotherapy. Methods A total of 113 patients with advanced breast cancer after breast-conserving chemotherapy in the West China Hospital from January 2019 to January 2020 were prospectively selected as the research objects. Before chemotherapy, one month after chemotherapy, and three months after chemotherapy, hope level (assessed by Herth hope level scale) and attribution method (assessed by attributional style questionnaire [ASQ]) of patients were evaluated, the changes of hope level and attribution mode in patients were observed, and the relationship between hope level and attribution mode were analyzed. Results After one and three months of chemotherapy, the scores and total scores of the Herth hope level scale were higher than those before chemotherapy, while after three months of chemotherapy were higher than after one month of chemotherapy, and the differences were statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05). After one and three months of chemotherapy, the positive event scores of patients with advanced breast cancer after breast-conserving chemotherapy on the ASQ were higher than those before chemotherapy, while the negative event scores were lower than those before chemotherapy, and the differences were statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05). And after three months of chemotherapy, the positive event score on the ASQ was higher than that of chemotherapy for one month, while the negative event score was lower than that of chemotherapy for one month, and the differences were statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05). Correlation analysis results showed that the scores and total scores of the various dimensions of the herth hope level scale were positively correlated with the positive event scores in the ASQ (r ＞ 0, P ＜ 0.05), while it was negatively correlated with the negative event score in the ASQ of attribution (r ＜ 0, P ＜ 0.05). Conclusion For patients with advanced breast cancer after breast-conserving chemotherapy, the level of hope is gradually increasing, and the attribution method gradually tends to be positive. There is a clear correlation between the level of hope and the attribution mode of patient.
向燕君1 谭明英1▲ 张正芳2 潘薇3. 晚期乳腺癌保乳术后化疗患者希望水平与归因方式的相关性[J]. 中国医药导报, 2021, 18(35): 113-116.
XIANG Yanjun1 TAN Mingying1▲ ZHANG Zhengfang2 PAN Wei3. Correlation between hope level and attribution mode of patients with advanced breast cancer after breast-conserving chemotherapy#br#. 中国医药导报, 2021, 18(35): 113-116.
[1] 李璐璐，李小妹，韩冬芳，等.乳腺癌患者心理痛苦轨迹及影响因素的纵向研究[J].中华护理杂志，2020，55（8）：1140-1146.
[2] Yi JC，Syrjala KL. Anxiety and Depression in Cancer Survivors [J]. Med Clin North Am，2017，101（6）：1099-1113.
[3] 吴子敬，刘叶，李小寒.乳腺癌患者心理韧性现状及其与焦虑抑郁的关系[J].中国医科大学学报，2018，47（1）：78-81.
[4] 赵欣欣，王玉梅.希望和乐观在终末期癌症患者社会支持与创伤后应激障碍间的中介作用[J].中国卫生统计，2019，36（4）：580-583.
[5] 詹敏.治疗性沟通及干预对乳腺癌手术患者术后恢复、心理应激及希望水平的影响[J].中国医药导报，2017，14（10）：177-180.
[6] Tamimi RM，Spiegelman D，Smith-Warner SA，et al. Population Attributable Risk of Modifiable and Nonmodifiable Breast Cancer Risk Factors in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer [J]. Am J Epidemiol，2016，184（12）：884-893.
[7] 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会.中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范（2013版）[J].中国癌症杂志，2013，23（8）：637-693.
[8] 王艳华.中文版Herth希望量表用于癌症病人的可行性研究[J].护理研究，2010，24（1）：20-21.
[9] Berry K，Bucci S，Kinderman P，et al. An investigation of attributional style，theory of mind and executive functioning in acute paranoia and remission [J]. Psychiatry Res，2015，226（1）：84-90.
[10] 刘姗.319例晚期乳腺癌患者灵性健康现状及影响因素分析[J].护理学报，2020，27（1）：52-55.
[11] Gudenkauf LM，Ehlers SL. Psychosocial interventions in breast cancer survivorship care [J]. Breast，2018，26（38）：1-6.
[12] 张飞艳，宋丽华.乳腺癌患者的心理状况及其心理干预[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志，2017，24（3）：212-216.
[13] Rust?覬en T，Lerdal A，Gay C，et al. Rasch analysis of the Herth Hope Index in cancer patients [J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes，2018，16（1）：196.
[14] 杨华，聂艳，宁若辰.抑郁归因风格、失控感及社会支持与大龄经产妇产后抑郁关系[J].中国计划生育学杂志，2020，28（12）：2025-2029.
[15] Whiteman DC，Wilson LF. The fractions of cancer attributable to modifiable factors：A global review [J]. Cancer Epidemiol，2016，7（44）：203-221.
[16] 严琼.胃癌患者归因方式与其负面情绪、人格特征的相关性[J].现代临床护理，2017，16（8）：11-16.
[17] 尹春岚，曲慧利，夏婷婷，等.青年乳腺癌术后患者病耻感及应对方式与心理社会适应的相关性研究[J].中国实用护理杂志，2019，35（15）：1126-1131.
[18] 郑楹楹，吕宏英，陈正飞，等.宫颈癌根治术后患者康复期症状体验及心理感受的质性研究[J].中华护理杂志，2020，55（4）：569-573.
[19] Tian H，Wang P. Development of the Attributional Style of Doctor Questionnaire [J]. Psychol Res Behav Manag，2020，27（13）：1079-1088.
[20] Friedenreich CM，Barberio AM，Pader J，et al. Estimates of the current and future burden of cancer attributable to lack of physical activity in Canada [J]. Prev Med，2019， 47（122）：65-72.
[21] 吕展杨，蔡建平，江子芳，等.乳腺癌患者恐惧疾病进展与生活质量和焦虑的相关性分析[J].中国现代医生，2021，59（3）：17-20.
[22] 徐海燕，张黎丹，杨红.有氧运动对乳腺癌患者癌因性疲乏影响的Meta分析[J].中国医药科学，2020，10（8）：23-27.
[23] 谢亚敏.乳腺癌患者希望水平与癌因性疲乏及负性情绪的关系研究[J.国际护理学杂志，2016，35（6）：817-819.
[24] Baczewska B，Block B，Kropornicka B，et al. Hope in Hospitalized Patients with Terminal Cancer [J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health，2019，16（20）：3867.
[25] 王蓉，李素芹，张虹.卵巢癌患者知信行、希望水平及应对方式调查[J].职业与健康，2019，35（9）：1193-1196， 1200.
[26] 杜亚莉，高媛，韩彦清.认知干预配合心理干预乳腺癌术后患者PICC置管相关并发症及情绪的影响[J].中国医药导报，2020，17（26）：182-185.
[27] 陈琳琳，周娜，黄旭倩，等.希望水平在中年癌症病人心理弹性与应对方式之间的中介效应[J].护理研究，2019，33（8）：1305-1308.
京公网安备 11010502046598号