Abstract：Objective To explore the effects of the new obstetrics labor standards on rate of using the operative vaginal delivery and of the intrapartum cesarean delivery, and the effect of maternal and neonatal outcomes. Methods The data of 1411 cases with singleton full term pregnancy and primipara gravidas trying to vaginal delivery in Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University from January to December, 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Among these 1411 women, 581 women were assigned into the new partogram group (New group) which were managed under the new labor stage standards. Another 830 cases were selected into the old partogram group (Old group) which were managed according to the old labor stage standards. Intrapartum cesarean delivery, operative vaginal delivery, postpartum hemorrhage and the neonatal asphyxia were compared between the two groups. Results The rate of intrapartum cesarean delivery and operative vaginal delivery in New group was lower than that in Old group (11.36% vs. 15.30%, 1.38% vs. 2.65%), the rate of postpartum hemorrhage and the asphyxia neonatorum in New groups was higher (5.34% vs. 5.30%, 0.86% vs. 0.36%). The difference of cesarean section rate between two groups had statistical significance (P < 0.05), the difference of others data between two groups had no statistical significance (P > 0.05). Conclusion Application of new labor stage standards can significantly decreased the rate of intrapartum cesarean section delivery, but more research will be needed to explain the results about effects on the maternal and neonatal outcomes and operative vaginal delivery.
[1] 侯磊，李光辉，邹丽颖.全国剖宫产率及剖宫产指征构成比调查的多中心研究[J].中华妇产科杂志，2014，49（10）：728-735.
[2] Zhang J，Landy HJ，Branch DW，et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes [J]. Obstet Gynecol，2010，116（6）：1281-1287.
[3] 张军，杨祖菁，霍晓娜.产程图的研究进展[J].中华围产医学杂志，2014，17（3）：145-147.
[4] Spong CY，Berghella V，Wenstrom KD，et al. Preventing the first cesarean delivery：summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development，Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine，and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop [J]. Obstet Gynecol，2012，120（5）：1181-1193.
[5] 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组.新产程标准及处理的专家共识（2014）[J].中华妇产科杂志，2014，49（7）：486.
[6] 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组.阴道手术助产指南（2016）[J].中华妇产科杂志，2016，51（8）：565-567.
[7] 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组.剖宫产手术的专家共识（2014）[J].中华妇产科杂志，2014，49（10）：721-724.
[8] 谢幸，苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京：人民卫生出版社，2013：178-208.
[9] 张宏，张惠欣.正常分娩定义与产程研究进展[J].中国生育健康杂志，2014，25（2）：189-192.
[10] 王静敏，武璁，汪素坤.新旧产程标准对分娩的影响[J].蚌埠医学院学报，2016，41（5）：603-607.
[11] Villar J，Carroli G，Zavaleta N，et al. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery：multicentre prospective study [J]. BMJ，2007，335（7628）：1025-1030.
[12] Villar J，Valladares E，Wojdyla D，et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes：the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America [J]. Lancet，2006，367（9525）：1819-1829.
[13] 魏琳娜，时元菊，余友霞.应用WHO推荐新版产程图对降低产程医疗干预的作用研究[J].重庆大学，2015， 44（25）：3567-3569．
[14] 赵瑞芬，周莉，范玲.新产程管理下第二产程时长对母儿结局的影响[J].北京医学，2015，37（7）：633-637.
[15] 冯秀.不规范产程干预与产后出血的关系[J].山东医药，2012，52（29）：93-94.
[16] 刘铭，段涛.控制剖宫产率的有效措施[J].实用妇产科杂志，2015，31（4）：243-245.
[17] 陈慧娟，吴蕾，付锦艳.新产程标准中第二产程时长对产妇和新生儿结局的影响研究[J].中华护理杂，2016， 51（10）：1170-1173.
[18] 胡小梅.新生儿窒息与产科因素的相关性分析及护理对策[J].中国实用护理杂志，2013，29（27）：50-51.
2018, Vol. 15 
京公网安备 11010502046598号