中国医药导报
中国医药期刊欢迎您 今天是   2025年4月17日星期四
设为首页 | 加入收藏 
 
        首 页      期刊介绍      下载中心      关于本刊      投稿指南      期刊订阅      在线留言      广告合作      联系我们      返回中国当代医药网
中国医药导报
  调查研究 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
美国创伤急诊评估工具的汉化及信效度检验
金晔  张玉勤  王陶  张春琰
北京积水潭医院创伤急诊科,北京   100075
Sinicization and validation of emergency trauma assessment tools in the United States
JIN Ye   ZHANG Yuqin   WANG Tao   ZHANG Chunyan
Department of Trauma Emergency, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing   100075, China
全文: PDF (530 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 分析汉化版美国通用创伤急诊评估工具(GETAC)在我国单中心运用的信效度。 方法 抽取北京积水潭医院2020年1月至6月153例急诊创伤患者,利用汉化版GETAC对患者进行回顾性分析。评价指标包括评定者信度、重测信度、内容效度、结构效度。信度分析采用Pearson相关性检验,效度分析采用探索性因子分析。结果 GETAC的评定者间信度为0.900,重测信度Ⅰ级条目Pearson系数均值为0.818,总分Pearson相关性系数为0.881;Ⅱ级条目Pearson系数均值为0.954,总分Pearson系数为0.828。GETAC单个条目内容效度指数(I-CVI)为0.857~1.000,各个条目I-CVI均>0.780,总条目内容效度指数(S-CVI)为0.916。因子分析共提取8个公因子,累计贡献率为65.63%;各个条目在相应公因子上的因子负荷均>0.4。 结论 GETAC具有良好的信效度,可适用于我国创伤急诊早期对患者的评估。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
金晔  张玉勤  王陶  张春琰
关键词 创伤急诊评估工具信度效度    
Abstract:Objective To analyze the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of generalized emergency trauma assessment criteria of America (GETAC) in single centers in China. Methods A total of 153 emergency trauma patients from Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from January to June 2020 were selected for retrospective analysis using the Chinese version of GETAC. The evaluation index includes evaluator reliability, retest reliability, content validity, and structure validity. Pearson correlation test was used for reliability analysis and exploratory factor analysis was used for validity analysis. Results The inter-rater reliability of GETAC was 0.900, the mean Pearson coefficient of Grade Ⅰ retest reliability items was 0.818, and the total Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.881. The mean Pearson coefficient of GradeⅡitems was 0.954, and the total Pearson coefficient was 0.828. The single item content validity index (I-CVI) of GETAC was 0.857 to 1.000, the I-CVI of each item was >0.780, and the scale content validity index was 0.916. A total of eight common factors were extracted by factor analysis, and the cumulative contribution rate was 65.63%. The factor load of each item on the corresponding common factor was >0.4. Conclusion GETAC has good reliability and validity, which can be applied to the early evaluation of patients in trauma emergency department in China.
Key wordsTrauma    Emergency    Evaluative tool    Reliability    Validity
    
基金资助:北京市属医院科研培育计划项目(PG2021008)。
引用本文:   
金晔  张玉勤  王陶  张春琰. 美国创伤急诊评估工具的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(23): 73-76.
JIN Ye ZHANG Yuqin WANG Tao ZHANG Chunyan. Sinicization and validation of emergency trauma assessment tools in the United States. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(23): 73-76.
链接本文:  
https://www.yiyaodaobao.com.cn/CN/10.20047/j.issn1673-7210.2023.20.15     或     https://www.yiyaodaobao.com.cn/CN/Y2023/V20/I23/73

 

中华人民共和国互联网药品信息服务资格证书(京)-非经营性-2016-0092
京ICP11001767号-2  京公网安备 11010502046598号  期刊出版许可证 广告经营许可证
信息产业部备案管理系统网址 http://beian.miit.gov.cn/state/outPortal/loginPortal.action
投稿热线:010-59626203
本刊地址:北京市朝阳区东四环中路78号楼(大成国际中心B1座)8B02室 邮编:100124
传真:010-59626204 投稿信箱:ddyy@vip.163.com
版权所有:中文传媒集团北京期刊有限公司
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司