Discussion on the scientificity of traditional Chinese medicine from cognitive mode
YAN Huiqian1 GE Haitao2 SUN Lingzhi3▲#br#
1.China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100085, China;
2.Institute of Innovation Strategy, China Association for Science and Technology, Beijing 100863, China;
3.School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 102488, China
[Abstract] At each stage of science development, there are overlapping of different cognitive methods. The vagueness of terminology leads to the limitation of cognition. The separate research fields have their own emphasis and lead to the tilt of evaluation. Human beings often respond to the scientific problems of traditional Chinese medicine based on the value, but ignored the medical culture. There is a philosophical dialectic between “comparative state” and double-blind testing, neither of which is invulnerable. The defenders themselves are also factors that create prejudice in traditional Chinese medicine. The education system of traditional Chinese medicine that has never kept pace with the times has delayed its scientific modernization. Traditional Chinese medicine was once a science because it conformed to the cognition and interpretation of science at that time, and it stayes in the pre-scientific era because of the contemporary definition of science.
闫慧茜1 葛海涛2 孙灵芝3▲. 从认知方式探讨中医的科学性[J]. 中国医药导报, 2022, 19(15): 129-132,147.
YAN Huiqian1 GE Haitao2 SUN Lingzhi3▲. Discussion on the scientificity of traditional Chinese medicine from cognitive mode. 中国医药导报, 2022, 19(15): 129-132,147.
京公网安备 11010502046598号