微创经皮桥式内固定支架治疗不稳定骨盆骨折的效果

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (25)
Related Citation (8)

Download: PDF (571 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical effect of minimally invasive percutaneous bridge internal fixation in the treatment of unstable pelvic fractures. Methods A total of 80 cases of unstable pelvic fracture in Yuebei People’s Hospital from January 2015 to January 2019 were collected as the research objects. According to the different surgical treatment methods, they were divided into observation group (43 cases) and control group (37 cases). The observation group was treated with minimally invasive percutaneous bridge internal fixation, and the control group was treated were traditional external fixation. The operation status, complication rate and operation effect of the two groups were statistically compared, and 12 months follow-up observation was conducted, the Harris hip joint score of the two groups was evaluated. Results The hospitalization time and fracture healing time of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05). The incidence of complications rate in the observation group was lower than that in the control group , and the difference was statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05). The excellent and good rate of fracture reduction in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05). There were highly statistically significant differences in the harris hip function score time between groups and interaction between the two groups (P ＜ 0.01). Further pair comparison and intra-group comparison: the Harris hip function score at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery in both groups were higher than those before surgery, and the differences at each time points after surgery were statistically significant (all P ＜ 0.05). Comparison between groups: the Harris hip function score in the observation group was higher than that in the control group at all time points, with all statistical significant differences (all P ＜ 0.05). Conclusion The clinical effect of minimally invasive percutaneous bridge internal fixation in the treatment of unstable pelvic fractures is significant, which can promote the fracture healing of patients, improve the reduction effect and postoperative hip joint activity function, and the incidence of complications is low, and the operation safety is better.

Key words： Pelvic fracture Minimally invasive percutaneous Bridge internal fixation Fracture healing Incidence of complications Excellent and good rate of operation

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIU Guoqiang1 ZENG Lingguo1 XIE Long1 ZHONG Xueren1 ZHOU Longze1 ZHOU Bin1 SI Zebing1 PENG Xiaoming1
	2

Cite this article:

LIU Guoqiang1 ZENG Lingguo1 XIE Long1 ZHONG Xueren1 ZHOU Longze1 ZHOU Bin1 SI Zebing1 PENG Xiaoming1,2. Effect of minimally invasive percutaneous bridge internal fixation in the treatment of unstable pelvic fractures[J]. 中国医药导报, 2021, 18(6): 103-106,114.

URL:

http://www.yiyaodaobao.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.yiyaodaobao.com.cn/EN/Y2021/V18/I6/103

[1] 孙再杰，杨思宇，郑益钒，等.3D导航下经皮骶髂螺钉联合前环外固定架治疗儿童不稳定骨盆骨折[J].创伤外科杂志，2020，37（1）：27-31.
[2] 黄光斌，胡平，高劲谋，等.严重骨盆骨折76例早期救治分析[J].创伤外科杂志，2019，21（1）：14-18.
[3] 韦仁杰，黄大波，黄明棣，等.经皮空心螺钉内固定与前路钢板内固定治疗不稳定性骨盆骨折疗效比较[J].海南医学，2018，29（4）：537-539.
[4] 付彦杰，何俊，张雨.经皮骶髂关节空心螺钉内固定联合外固定架治疗C型骨盆骨折的疗效[J].临床医学研究与实践，2018，3（32）：86-87.
[5] Roux C，Tselikas L，Yevich S，et al. Fluoroscopy and Cone-Beam CT-guided Fixation by Internal Cemented Screw for Pathologic Pelvic Fractures [J]. Radiology，2018，28（11）：210-215.
[6] 李鑫.骨盆前外固定术在不稳定性骨盆骨折治疗中的作用[J].中国伤残医学，2018，26（4）：28-29.
[7] 罗思进.用经皮微创螺钉内固定术治疗骨盆骨折的效果研析[J].当代医药论丛，2019，17（3）：101-103.
[8] Ingoe HM，Coleman E，Eardley W，et al. Systematic review of systematic reviews for effectiveness of internal fixation for flail chest and rib fractures in adults [J]. BMJ Open，2019，9（4）：291-295.
[9] Campbell A，Dugarte A，Ly TV. Minimally Invasive Endoscopic-Assisted Technique for Implant Removal After Pelvic Bridge Plating [J]. J Orthop Trauma，2018，32（11）：1-6.
[10] 郎良军，周云斌，鲁银坡.不稳定骨盆骨折65例手术临床研究[J].浙江创伤外科，2019，24（4）：703-705.
[11] 徐大伟，杨建，王飞，等.前环经皮内固定支架治疗TileB型骨盆骨折[J].南通大学学报：医学版，2018，38（2）：95-97.
[12] 李俊，沈成华，熊才亮，等.Stoppa入路治疗骨盆前环骨折的临床疗效观察[C].贵州省医学会骨科学分会.贵州省医学会骨科学分会2014年学术年会论文汇编.贵州省医学会骨科学分会：贵州省科学技术协会，2014：149-150.
[13] 杨进，荔琦，常春峰.早期量化功能锻炼对髋关节骨折患者血液流变功能及炎症因子的影响[J].血栓与止血学，2020，26（2）：250-251.
[14] 罗俊浩，尹英超，侯志勇，等.骨盆前环骨折的手术治疗[J].临床外科杂志，2020，28（1）：99-100.
[15] 段德胜，陈开放，郭晓东，等.前环钉-棒系统联合经皮骶髂螺钉微创治疗不稳定型骨盆骨折[J].中华医学杂志，2018，98（29）：2346-2348.
[16] 陈龙，汪国栋，刘曦明，等.3D导航辅助下经皮骶髂螺钉内固定联合逆行前柱螺钉内固定或前环外固定支架治疗Tilt骨盆骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤杂志，2018， 34（2）：145-151.
[17] 张堃，米仲祥，南学彦，等.INFIX治疗TileB型骨盆骨折临床观察[J].实用骨科杂志，2018，24（6）：550-552.
[18] 吴刚，谭伦，李邦青，等.微创经皮桥式内固定支架与传统外固定支架治疗不稳定骨盆骨折疗效比较[J].中国修复重建外科杂志，2020，34（5）：563-568.
[19] 王林.经皮内固定架与外固定架治疗不稳定骨盆骨折的疗效分析[J].创伤外科杂志，2017，19（9）：705-707.
[20] 李鑫.比较骨盆骨折合并骶髂关节脱位经皮空心螺钉内固定与切开复位重建钢板内固定治疗的临床疗效[J].中国伤残医学，2018，28（29）：182-185.
[21] Rommens PM，Wagner D，Hofmann A. Minimal Invasive Surgical Treatment of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis [J]. Chirurgia （Bucur），2017，112（5）：524-537.
[22] 阎海威，胡居正，杨英，等.微创经皮骨盆前环内固定治疗不稳定性前环损伤的疗效及早期并发症分析[J].中华骨科杂志，2019，39（13）：826-832.
[23] 王建超，高嵩，刘继，等.微创经皮钢板内固定与皮下前环内置外架固定治疗骨盆前环骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志，2019，21（12）：1041-1046.
[24] 程国芳，何宝林，王小伟.空心螺钉内固定联合外固定治疗C型骨盆骨折患者的效果[J].中国临床实用医学，2018，9（1）：38-40.
[25] 张子春.经皮空心螺钉技术与钢板内固定及外固定治疗不稳定型骨盆骨折的疗效对比[J].医学理论与实践，2018，31（7）：1014-1015.