|
|
A meta-analysis of treatment of mixed hemorrhoids with external hemorrhoid resection combined with internal hemorrhoids automatic elastic wire-sheathing |
GUO Shiqi1,2 LI Huashan2 |
1.College of Graduate, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China;
2.Department of Anorectal, Guang′anmen Hospital Affiliated China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To analysis the results of a randomized controlled trial of external hemorrhoidectomy combined with internal hemorrhoid bandaging in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids by meta-analysis, and to evaluate the effects of external hemorrhoidectomy combined with internal hemorrhoid bandaging and traditional external stripping in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids. Methods The literatures of CNKI and Wanfang database from June 1966 to June 2019 were searched. A total of 8 articles were included in this study, and the obeservation was given external hemorrhoidectomy combined with automatic elastic wire-sheathing, the control group was given traditional external strippin. The surgical effect, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, pain score at 1 d after operation and postoperative complications were compared by meta-analysis. Results Comparison of surgical effects of patients between the two groups, the difference was not statistically significant (RR = 0.00, 95%CI: -0.03, 0.03, P > 0.05). The operation time of the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (MD = -7.73, 95%CI: -10.75, 4.70), while the intraoperative blood loss was less than that of the control group (MD = -13.06, 95%CI: -13.64, -12.47), and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in 1 d after surgery (MD = -0.93, 95%CI: -1.99, 0.14) and postoperative complications (RR = -0.16, 95%CI: -0.70, 0.37) of patients between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion The curative effect of external hemorrhoidectomy combined with automatic elastic wire-sheathing of internal hemorrhoids is better than that of traditional external stripping, and it is worthy of clinical promotion.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 刘金华,孙静,褚家云,等.内痔套扎联合外痔切除术治疗混合痔60例的临床观察[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2018,5(21):37-38.
[2] 冯雪雅.RPH联合外痔切除保留齿状线术治疗混合痔的临床研究[D].南充:川北医学院,2018.
[3] 刘伟伟,豆慧杰,王继成.外痔切除联合内痔套扎术治疗混合痔患者的临床观察[J].中国民康医学,2017,29(5):35-37.
[4] 张磊昌,胡晓阳,葛巍,等.内痔套扎联合外痔切除治疗混合痔疗效分析[J].江西中医药,2017,48(12):23-24, 43.
[5] 晁忠,郭红飞.自动弹力线痔疮套扎器联合外痔切除术治疗混合痔的临床疗效分析[J].中外医疗,2017,36(14):110-112.
[6] 杨丽丽,张磊,张溪.自动弹力线套扎术联合外痔切除缝合术治疗环状脱垂性混合痔临床研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2018,47(2):177-179,195.
[7] 胡迪波.自动弹力线痔疮套扎器联合外剥内扎术治疗混合痔的临床疗效观察[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017, 4(A4):20531-20532.
[8] 闫序波,孙旭,徐孟,等.超声刀外痔切除联合弹力线内痔套扎术治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度混合痔的临床效果研究[J].结直肠肛门外科,2018,24(6):579-582.
[9] 霍旺,徐慧岩,曹科,等.内套外切保留肛管术治疗环状混合痔的疗效观察[J].解放军医学院学报,2018,39(2):130-132.
[10] 张茜,贝绍生,李宇飞,等.超声刀外痔切除联合弹力线内痔套扎术治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度混合痔体会[J].结直肠肛门外科,2017,23(2):257-259.
[11] 魏启财.选择性痔上黏膜切除钉合术治疗混合痔的效果[J].中外医学研究,2018,16(25):129-130.
[12] 黄国锋,邱光明,周明珠,等.选择性痔上黏膜切除钉合术和痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗环状混合痔的优劣差异[J].中国医药科学,2018,8(2):199-201,246.
[13] 王静,黄峰.自动痔疮套扎、外痔切剥术与太宁栓联合治疗混合痔的临床研究[J].结直肠肛门外科,2017,23(4):511-514.
[14] 张搏,王姗姗,徐月,等.弹力线套扎术与胶圈套扎术治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度混合痔临床观察[J].中国中医急症,2017,26(2):351-354.
[15] 马勇,吴伟强,杨建栋,等.RPH联合外痔切除术治疗Ⅲ~Ⅳ期混合痔的临床分析[J].西北国防医学杂志,2019, 40(1):29-34.
[16] 程相冰,王雪峰.两种术式对治疗急性嵌顿性混合痔的疗效对比[J].结直肠肛门外科,2017,23(S1):69,71.
[17] 谢刚,苏其玲,罗美清,等.自动弹力线痔疮套扎术辅以黏膜下注射对轻中度混合痔的临床疗效[J].临床与病理杂志,2018,38(10):84-88.
[18] 周凯亮,邹贤军,司徒光伟.弹力线套扎术治疗混合痔嵌顿的疗效观察[J].广东医学,2017,38(11):1717-1719.
[19] 王翔,薛昶.内痔分段结扎、外痔环形切除联合肛缘皮桥弧状切除缝合术治疗环形混合痔的疗效观察[J].结直肠肛门外科,2017,23(5):598-602.
[20] 詹敏,李逵,严建,等.两种微创术式治疗老年混合痔的临床疗效比较[J].现代生物医学进展,2017,17(12):2256-2259.
[21] 胡立强,席志强.串联式套扎法结合外痔切除术治疗老年混合痔患者的临床观察[J].结直肠肛门外科,2018, 24(1):42-45.
[22] 武江宏.不同术式治疗环状混合痔的临床效果对比分析[J].中外医学研究,2018,16(11):141-142.
[23] 谢闻文,李德亮.吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术加外痔切除术治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度混合痔的效果[J].中国医药科学,2019, 9(12):192-194,231.
[24] 魏多刚,张婧芳,康文,等.小切口外痔剥除联合痔上黏膜环切术治疗环状混合痔疗效观察[J].中国临床医生杂志,2017,45(2):76-78.
[25] 邓建宏,张涛,曹佳芹,等.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗环状混合痔120例临床观察[J].中国现代医生,2018, 56(1):82-84. |
|
|
|