Abstract：Objective To evaluate the applicability of target controlled infusion (TCI) with Propofol by March model and Schnider model during gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Methods One hundred unpremedicated patients (18 to 55 years, ASA Ⅰor Ⅱ ) undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy in Shenzhen Nanshan People′s Hospital from Janurary to June 2016 were randomized into two groups (n = 25 each ) using a random number table ：group M and group S. Propofol was administered by TCI, with respectively March model and Schnider model in two groups, and combined with Remifentanil. The age, weight, anesthetic time, operative time, time for loss of consciousness, the corresponding amount of Propofol and effect site concentration of Propofol (Ce) at loss of consciousness (LOC) and Ce at recovery of consciousness(ROC), time from discontinuation to analepsia, time from discontinuation to extubation, heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and bispectral index (BIS) were monitored and recorded before induction (T0), loss of consciousness (T1), before intubating (T2), after intubating (T3), skin incision (T4), consciousness (T5), extubation (T6), the total amount and unit time amount of Propofol. Intraoperative awareness was evaluated at 24 hours postoperation. Results There was no significant different in the time of lose consciousness and the amount of Propofol between group M and S (P > 0.05). but The total amount and unit time amount of Propofol in group S were more than that in group M (P < 0.05). The time from discontinuation to analepsia and the time from discontinuation to extubation of group S were both longer than group M (P < 0.05). Compared with T0, there were no significant different in HR, MAP at T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 in both groups(P > 0.05). Compared with group M, there were no significant different in HR, MAP at T0-6 in group S(P > 0.05). There were no significant different in BIS at T0, T2, T3 between the two groups, but at T1, T4, T5, T6 BIS in group S were lower than in group M (P < 0.05). No intraoperative awareness happended. In group M Ce at LOC was positively correlated to Ce at ROC (P < 0.05). Conclusion TCI with Propofol during gynecological laparoscopic surgery, Marsh model was better than Schnider model.
魏宏 冯洁华 涂汉坤 李朝阳▲ 吴冬 罗晓敏. 丙泊酚靶控输注Marsh模式和Schnider模式在妇科腹腔镜手术中应用的比较[J]. 中国医药导报, 2018, 15(10): 91-94.
WEI Hong FENG Jiehua Tu Hankun LI Chaoyang▲ WU Dong LUO Xiaoming . The application of target controlled infusion with Propofol by Marsh model versus Schnider model during gynecological laparoscopic surgery . 中国医药导报, 2018, 15(10): 91-94.
[1] 熊云川，钟涛.丙泊酚靶控输注期间麻醉深度指数对不同年龄患者意识状态的预测效果[J].南方医科大学学报，2010，30（11）：2558-2561.
[2] 施冲，吴群林，刘中华，等.脑功能区手术唤醒麻醉与清醒程度的研究[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志，2005，10（11）：497-498.
[3] 杨婉花，陈冰，李娟，等.丙泊酚药物代谢动力学研究概述[J].中国药师，2008，11（10）：1243-1246.
[4] Lee YH，Choi GH，Jung KW，et al. Predictive performance of the modified Marsh and Schnider models for propofol in underweight patients undergoing general anaesthesia using target-controlled infusion [J]. Br J Anaesth，2017，118（6）：883-891
[5] White M，Kenny GN. Intravenous propofol anaesthesia using a computerised infusion system [J]. Anaesthesia，1990，45（3）：204-209.
[6] Struys MM，De Smet T，Depoorter B，et al. Comparison of plasma compartment versus two methods for effect compartment–controlled target-controlled infusion for propofol [J]. Anesthesiology，2000，92（2）：399-399.
[7] Beller JP，Pottecher T，Lugnier A，et al. Prolonged sedation with propofol in ICU patients：recovery and blood concentration changes during periodic interruptions in infusion [J]. Br J Anaesth，1988，61（5）：583-588.
[8] Passot S，Servin F，Allary R，et al. Target-controlled versus manually-controlled infusion of propofol for direct laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy [J]. Anesth Analg，2002， 94（5）：1212-1216.
[9] 王英姿，彭志勇，殷爽，等.七氟烷或丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼全麻对腹腔镜手术患者麻醉苏醒期的影响[J].中华林场医学杂志：电子版，2016，10（21）：3185-3189.
[10] 李晓婷，王胜斌，张野.I-gel喉罩用于腔镜甲状腺手术全麻患者的临床观察[J].天津医药，2015，43（2）：209-213.
[11] Nelson P，Nelson JA，Chen AJ，et al. An alternative position for the BIS-Vista montage in frontal approach neurosurgical cases [J]. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol，2013，25（2）：135-142.
[12] Pauls RJ，Dickson TJ，Kaufmann AM，et al. A comparison of the ability of the EEGo and BIS monitors to assess emergence following neurosurgery [J]. Can J Anaesth，2009，56（5）：366-373.
[13] Rouche O，Wolak-Thierry A，Destoop Q，et al. Evaluation of the depth of sedation in an intensive care unit based on the photo motor reflex variations measured by video pupillometry [J]. Ann intensive care，2013，3（1）：5.
[14] Kim JY，Park SY，Park SK，et al. Titration of the plasma effect site equilibrium rate constant of propofol; a link method of ‘Concentration-Probability-Time’ [J]. Korean J Anaethesiol，2010，58（3）：231-238.
[15] Dahaba AA，Zhong T，Lu HS，et al. Geographic differences in the target-controlled infusion estimated concentration of propofol：bispectral index response curves [J]. Can J Anaesth，2011;58（4）：364-370.
[16] Jung SM，Yang CW，Oh JY，et al. Predicted effect-site concentration of propofol and sufentanil for gynecological laparoscopic surgery [J]. Acta Anaethesiol Scand，2011， 55（1）：110-117.
[17] Schnider TW，Minto CF，Gambus PL，et al. The influence of method of administrationand covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers [J]. Anesthesiology，1998，88（5）：1170-1182
[18] Absalom AR，Mani V，De Smet T，et al. Pharmacokinetic models for propofol-defining and illuminating the devil in the detail [J]. Br J Anaesth，103（1）：26-37.
[19] 安宁，陈敏，刘萍，等.HC可视喉镜，GlideScope 视频喉镜和Macintosh直接喉镜在颈椎制动患者气管插管中的比较[J].华中科技大学学报：医学版，2013，42（4）：405-408.
[20] Jeon WJ，Cho SY，Bang MR，et al. Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation using a laryngeal mask airway during gynecological laparoscopy [J]. Korean J Anesthesiol，2011，60（3）：167-172.
2018, Vol. 15 
京公网安备 11010502046598号