Abstract：Objective To translate and debug decision preparation scale cross the cultural, and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of preparation decision making scale (PreDM) among patients with visual disturbance. Methods Based on the scale introduction principles, a Chinese version of the PreDM was formed through translation, back translation and cross-cultural debugging. The convenience sampling method was used to select a total of 105 visually impaired patients who visited the Ophthalmology Department of the First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University from April to October 2018 were selected by the convenience sampling method. The reliability and validity of the results were investigated. Results The Chinese version of the PreDM had a content validity of 0.95, the retest reliability of the scale was 0.634, and the Cronbach′s α coefficient was 0.965. The exploratory factor analysis extracted a total of 1 common factor and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 76.506%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that each index was fitted well. Conclusion The Chinese version of PreDM has good reliability and validity in visually impaired patients, and can be used to evaluate decision-making readiness of visually impaired patients.
万君丽 卞薇 郭文梅 苏君 谭明琼 刘明琼. 中文版决策准备量表应用于视力障碍患者的信效度研究[J]. 中国医药导报, 2020, 17(9): 49-52.
WAN Junli BIAN Wei GUO Wenmei SU Jun TANG Mingqiong LIU Mingqiong. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of preparation decision making scale among patients with visual disturbance. 中国医药导报, 2020, 17(9): 49-52.
[1] 葛坚，王宁利.眼科学[M].3版.北京：人民卫生出版社，2015.
[2] Wang BZ，Pesudovs K，Keane MC，et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of multidisciplinary low-vision rehabilitation [J]. Optom Vis Sci，2012，89（9）：1399-1408.
[3] Binns AM，Bunce C，Dickinson C，et al. How effective is low vision service provision? A systematic review [J]. Surv Ophthalmol，2012，57（1）：34-65.
[4] Girdler SJ，Boldy DP，Dhaliwal SS，et al. Vision self-management for older adults：a randomised controlled trial [J]. Br J Ophthalmol，2010，94（2）：223-228.
[5] Bennett C，Graham ID，Kristjansson E，et al. Validation of a Preparation for Decision Making scale [J]. Patient Educ Couns，2010，78（1）：130-133.
[6] 王思慧，谢培英.低视力学[M].北京：北京人民出版社，2003.
[7] Such E，Germing U，Malcovati L，et al. Development and validation of a prognostic scoring system for patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia [J]. Blood，2013，121（15）：3005-3015.
[8] 郭金玉，李峥.量表引进的过程及评价标准.中华护理杂志，2012，47（3）：283-285.
[9] Burundukova OL，Ivanova LA，Ivanov LA，et al. Mesostructure of the ginseng photosynthetic apparatus in relation to ecological strategy of the species [J]. Russian J Pl Physiol，2008，55（2）：246-248.
[10] 刘可.如何进行内容效度的检验[J].护理进修杂志，2010，25（1）：37-39.
[11] 董伟.国内近十年数字图书馆领域研究热点分析——基于共词分析[J].图书情报知识，2009（5）：58-63.
[12] Chewning B，Bylund CL，Shah B，et al. Patient preferences for shared decisions：A systematic review [J]. Patient Edu Couns，2012，86（1）：9-18.
[13] Arnetz JE，Almin I，Bergstr?觟m K，et al. Active patient involvement in the establishment of physical therapy goals：Effects on treatment outcome and quality of care [J]. Adv Physiother，2016，6（2）：20.
[14] 李峥，刘宇.护理学研究方法[M].北京：人民卫生出版社，2018.
[15] Nancy B，Grove S. The practice of nursing research：onduct，critique and utilization [M]. 4th ed. Pennsylvania：He center independence square West Philadelphia，2001.
[16] 李玉，叶志霞，刘佩玉，等.癌症患者治疗决策辅助的研究进展[J].中华护理杂志，2017，52（1）：28-33.
[17] Lam WW，Kwok M，Liao Q，et al. Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the decisional conflict scale in Chinese women making decision for breast cancer surgery [J]. Health Expect，2015，18（2）：210-220.
[18] Tsulukidze M，Grande SW，Gionfriddo MR. Assessing Option Grid? practicability and feasibility for facilitating shared decision making：An exploratory study [J]. Patient Educ Coun，2015，98（7）：871-877.
[19] 周晓楠，李峥，康晓凤.患者意愿的研究进展[J].医学与哲学（A），2017，38（1）：47-50.
[20] 姚抒予，张雯，罗媛慧，等.医患共同决策的研究进展[J].中国护理管理，2017，17（3）：428-431.
2020, Vol. 17 
京公网安备 11010502046598号