Abstract:Objective To discuss the clinical effects of different oxygen concentrations during neonatal asphyxiation recovery. Methods 120 full-term newborns with asphyxia treated in the Sixth People's Hospital of Nanning City from February 2016 to February 2017 were selected. The newborns were randomly divided into the air resuscitation group, low concentration oxygen group and high concentration oxygen group, each group had 40 cases. The air resuscitation group was treated with air resuscitation, high concentration oxygen group was treated with 100% oxygen resuscitation, and low concentration oxygen group was treated with 30% oxygen resuscitation. The time of began to cry and spontaneous breathing establishment, Apgar scores at different time after birth, recovery success rate and recovery safety of the three groups were compared. Results There were statistically significant differences in the time of began to cry and the time of spontaneous breathing establishment among the three groups (P < 0.05), of which the air resuscitation group and low concentration oxygen group were all shorter than the high concentration oxygen group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05), the low concentration oxygen group were shorter than the air resuscitation group, but no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in Apgar scores at different time after birth among the three groups (P < 0.05), of which the air resuscitation group and low concentration oxygen group were higher than the high concentration oxygen group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05), the low concentration oxygen group were higher than the air resuscitation group, but no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). The incidence of neonatal brain injury of the air resuscitation group and low concentration oxygen group were lower than those of the high concentration oxygen group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05), while the low concentration oxygen group was lower than the air resuscitation group, but no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). The successful rate of recovery was 100.00% in three groups. The incidence of oxygen poisoning of the air resuscitation group and low concentration oxygen group were lower than those of the high concentration oxygen group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05), while the low concentration oxygen group was lower than the air resuscitation group, but no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Conclusion During the course of neonatal asphyxia resuscitation, 30% oxygen resuscitation is effective, which can achieve better recovery effect, effectively reduce brain damage and avoid the emergence of oxygen poisoning. It is a more safe and effective recovery program.