The influences of nutrition support on clincal efficacy and quality of life in elderly patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
LIU Xinyan TUO Xiping
Department of Gerontology, Changhai Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
Abstract：Objective To explore the influences of nutrition support on clincial efficacy and quality of life in elderly patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD). Methods A total of 62 elderly patients with AECOPD treated in Putuo District Central Hospital of Shanghai from August to September 2016 were randomly divided into conventional treatment group and nutrition intervention group by random number table, with 31 cases in each group. The conventional treatment group was given conventional drug treatment and the nutrition intervention group was given nutrition support for 4 weeks additionally on the bases of conventional treatment group. Short form mini-nutritional assessment (MNA-SF), COPD assessment test (CAT) and St. George respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) were used to evaluate the nutritional status, acute episodes, hospitalization and quality of life before and after treatment. Results Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in the two groups in the level of ALB, PA,Hb and scores of MNA-SF (P ＞ 0.05). After treatment for 4 weeks, the indicators above in the nutrition intervention group were all higher than those of before treatment, after treatment for 2 weeks and the conventional treatment group, with statistically significant differences (all P ＜ 0.05). The hospitalization is much shorter than that of conventional treatment group, with statistically significant differences (P ＜ 0.05). Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the scores of CAT (P ＞ 0.05). After treatment for 4 weeks, the scores of CAT in the nutrition intervention group was lower than that of conventional treatment group, with statistically significant differences(P ＜ 0.05). Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in the scores of all items and total score of quality of life between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05). After treatment for 4 weeks, the scores of those above were all decreased and those in the nutrition intervention group were much lower than those of conventional treatment group, with statistically significant differences(P ＜ 0.05). Conclusions Nutrition support can improve the nutritional status in the treatment of elderly patients with AECOPD, promote the clinical curative effect and quality of life.
刘欣艳 拓西平. 营养支持对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者临床疗效和生活质量的影响[J]. 中国医药导报, 2017, 14(32): 104-107,111.
LIU Xinyan TUO Xiping. The influences of nutrition support on clincal efficacy and quality of life in elderly patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 中国医药导报, 2017, 14(32): 104-107,111.
[1] Seemungal TA，Wedzicha JA. Update in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2014 [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med，2015，192（9）：1036-1044.
[2] Negewo NA，McDonald VM，Gibson PG. Comorbidity in obstructive pulmonary disease [J]. Respir Investig，2015， 53（6）：249-258.
[3] Cui J，Wan Q，Wu X，et al. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 as a Predictor of Outcome During General Ward-Based Noninvasive Ventilation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Respiratory Failure [J]. Med Sci Monit，2015， 21（2）：2786-2793.
[4] Sugawara K，Takahashi H，Kasai C，et al. Effects of nutritional supplementation combined with low-intensity exercise in malnourished patients with COPD [J]. Respir Med，2010，104（12）：1883-1889.
[5] Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and preventionof chronic obstructive pulmonary disease （updated 2015）[EB/OL]. [2015-01] http：//www.goldcopd.org/guidelines-global-strategy-for-diagnosis-management.html.
[6] Rubenstein LZ，Harker JO，Salva A，et al. Screening for under-nutrition in geriatric practice：developing the short-form mini-nutritional assessment（MNA-SF）[J].J Gerontol A Biol Sei Med Sei，2001，56（6）：M366-M372.
[7] 杜佳，雷撼，胡芸，等.SGRQ、CAT和CCQ问卷在COPD患者生活质量中的评估价值比较[J].现代生物医学进展，2015，15（12）：2313-2315.
[8] Swigris JJ，Esser D，Conoscenti CS，et al. The psychometric properties of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire（SGRQ）in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis：a literature review [J]. Health Qual Life Out，2014，12（1）：124.
[9] 徐非凡.有创和无创正压通气治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期合并呼吸衰竭患者的效果比较[J].中国医药导报，2016，13（8）：128-131.
[10] 刘少甜，王建，吴燕娟，等.早期序贯性营养支持治疗AECOPD合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭[J].局解手术学杂志，2016， 25（7）：503-506.
[11] 杨华，周志才，奚峰.营养状况对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期严重程度及预后的评估[J].实用老年医学，2013， 27（4）：328-330.
[12] 任丹，温红侠，孙莉.老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并营养不良的研究进展[J].实用老年医学，2016，6（3）：16-18.
[13] 程文涛.营养支持在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期中的疗效观察[J].临床肺科杂志，2015，12（7）：1272-1275.
[14] 中华医学会重症医学分会.中国重症加强治疗病房危重患者营养支持指导意见（2006）[J].中华外科杂志，2006， 44（9）：1167.
[15] 庞晓军，苏方，曾红，等.强化肠内营养治疗营养不良慢性阻塞性肺疾病[J].中国医院药学杂志，2012，32（19）：1556-1558.
[16] 庞晓军，杜正隆，曾红，等.强化肠外营养治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者的临床观察[J].中国药房，2010， 21（28）：2612.
[17] 程文涛.营养支持在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期中的疗效观察[J].临床肺科杂志，2015，20（7）：1272-1273.
[18] Snider JT，Jena AB，Linthicum MT，et al. Effect of hospital use of oral nutritional supplementation on length of stay hospital cost，and 30-day readmissions among Medicare patients with COPD [J]. Chest，2015，147（6）：1477-1484.
[19] 赵云峰，姜艳平，程改存，等.圣乔治呼吸问卷和慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试问卷评价慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期患者健康相关生活质量的比较[J].上海医学医药，2013，36（1）：47-49.
[20] 林良友，刘丰，蔡敬宙，等.灯盏花素联合自血穴位注射疗法治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期[J].广州医药，2015，46（4）：47-48.
[21] 何涛，李小莉，盛健，等.营养支持对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期机械通气患者的临床疗效观察[J].医学信息，2014，27（23）：95-96.
2017, Vol. 14 
京公网安备 11010502046598号