Abstract：Objective To observe whether the clinical effect of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciitis is better than conventional treatment therapy. Methods A total of 60 patients underwent treatment continuously from July 2016 to March 2017 were included in this study. All patients were randomly divided into radial extracorporeal shock wave group and traditional treatment group (control group), with 30 cases in each group. Patients in radial extracorporeal shock wave group underwent radial extracorporeal shock wave, with pressure of 2.5-4.0 bar, 2000 impacts each time, one time per week and 3 times totally. The control group was treated with topical solution for Flurbiprofen Cataplasms combined with plantar fascia stretching exercise. The visual analogue scale (VAS) of the two groups was compared before treatment, and 1, 4, 12 and 24 weeks after treatment. The AOFAS scores before treatment and at the end of follow-up were compared between the two groups. The overall superior rate were compared between the two groups after treatment for 24 weeks. Results The VAS scores in the shock wave group were all lower than those in the control group after treatment for 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks, and the differences were statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05). The function score of shock wave group was higher than that of the control group at 24 weeks′ follow-up, and the difference was statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05). After treatment for 24 weeks, the overall superior rate of the shock wave group was also higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05). Conclusion Both therapies can reduce pain and improve the ankle functions for plantar fasciitis patients, but the effect of radial extracorporeal shock wave is significantly better than the traditional treatment of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs combined with plantar fascia stretching training, is a new choice for the treatment of plantar fasciitis.
颜世昌 王鑫强 成婷婷 庞成龙 陈晖. 发散式体外冲击波与传统方式治疗跖筋膜炎的效果比较[J]. 中国医药导报, 2018, 15(27): 66-69.
YAN Shichang WANG Xinqiang CHENG Tingting PANG Chenglong CHEN Hui. Effect comparison of radial divergent extracorporeal shock wave and traditional method in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. 中国医药导报, 2018, 15(27): 66-69.
[1] Goff JD，Crawford R. Diagnosis and treatment of plantar fasciitis [J]. Am Fam Physician，2011，84（6）：676-682.
[2] Beeson P. Plantar fasciopathy：revisiting the risk factors [J]. Foot Ankle Surg，2014，20（3）：160-165.
[3] Tong KB，Furia J. Economic burden of plantar fasciitis in the United States [J]. Am J Orthop，2010，39（5）：223-227.
[4] 王帅，刘水涛，邢更彦，等.发散式体外冲击波不同方案治疗跖筋膜炎型跟痛症的效果对比[J].中国医学前沿杂志：电子版，2016，8（1）：29-32.
[5] Haake M，Buch M，Schoellner C，et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciitis：randomised controlled multicentre trial [J]. BMJ，2003，327（7406）：75.
[6] Schmitz C，Császár NB，Milz S，et al. Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for orthopedic conditions：a systematic review on studies listed in the PEDro database [J]. British Medical Bulletin，2015，116：115-138.
[7] Jiale Sun，Fuqiang Gao，Yanhua Wang，et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is effective in treating chronic plantar fasciitis：A meta-analysis of RCTs [J]. Medicine，2017，96：15（e6621）.
[8] Ibrahim MI，Donatelli RA，Hellman M，et al. Long-term results of radial extracorporeal shock wave treatment for chronic plantar fasciopathy：a prospective，randomized，placebo-controlled trial with two years follow-up [J]. J Orthop Res，2017，35（7）：1532-1538.
[9] Ogden JA，Tóth-Kischkat A，Schultheiss R. Principles of shock wave therapy [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res，2001（387）：8-17.
[10] Waugh CM，Morrissey D，Jones E，et al. In vivo biological response to extracorporeal shockwave therapy in human tendinopathy [J]. Eur Cell Mater，2015，29：268-280.
[11] van der Worp H，van den Akker-Scheek I，van Schie H，et al. ESWT for tendinopathy：technology and clinical implications [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc，2013， 21（6）：1451-1458.
[12] Verstraelen FU，In den Kleef NJ，Jansen L，et al. High-energy versus low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy for calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder：which is superior? a Meta-analysis [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res，2014， 472（9）：2816-2825.
[13] Alkhawashki HM. Shock wave therapy of fracture nonu-nion [J]. Injury，2015，46（11）：2248-2252.
[14] Kim JH，Kim JY，Choi CM，et al. The Dose-Related Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis [J]. Ann Rehabil Med，2015，39（4）：616-623.
[15] Rompe JD，Cacchio A，Weil L Jr，et al. Plantar fascia-specific stretching versus radial shock-wave therapy as initial treatment of plantar fasciopathy[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am，2010，92（15）：2514-2522.
[16] Gerdesmeyer L，Frey C，Vester J，et al. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of chronic recalcitrant plantar fasciitis：results of a confirmatory randomized placebo-controlled multicenter study [J]. Am J Sports Med，2008，36（11）：2100-2109.
[17] Rompe JD，Schoellner C，Nafe B. Evaluation of low-energy extracorporeal shock-wave application for treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am，2002，84-A（3）：335-341.
[18] Rompe JD，Meurer A，Nafe B，et al. Repetitive lowenergy shock wave application without local anesthesia is more efficient than repetitive low-energy shock wave application with local anesthesia in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis [J]. J Orthop Res，2005，23（4）：931-941.
[19] Saxena A，Hong BK，Yun AS，et al. Treatment of plantar fasciitis with radial soundwave “early” is better than after 6 months：a pilot study [J]. J Foot Ankle Surg，2017， 56（5）：950-953.
2018, Vol. 15 
京公网安备 11010502046598号