摘要目的 分析“老五所”中医药院校的科技论文收录情况,从一定程度上反映各高校的综合科研能力。 方法 以近十年(2007年1月~2017年5月)Web of Science数据库收录的“老五所”科技论文为分析对象,运用文献计量学方法,对文献进行统计分析,从自然科学和人文社会科学两个方面的文献发文量、来源出版物、论文被引情况、影响因子、H指数、优势学科等方面进行分析。 结果 “老五所”论文发表数量呈逐年增长趋势,但论文平均影响因子与被引量不高;在SCIE收录的科技论文中,Evidence Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine是出现频次最高的来源出版物;在优势学科比较中,中药学与中西医结合医学发展较好,但中医学较弱;与自然科学相比,人文社会科学发展缓慢。 结论 “老五所”科技论文在保证数量稳步上升的同时,应保证其质量,协同发展弱势学科和中医药特色学科,进一步彰显“老五所”综合实力。
Abstract:Objective To analysis the publication of scientific papers of “The five” Chinese medicine universities and reflect the comprehensive scientific research ability of universities in a certain extent. Methods Scientific papers of “The five” included in the Web of Science Database in the last ten years (from January 2007 to May 2017) were used as analysis object, bibliometrics method was used to statistically analysis literatures on the volume of literature, including the publication of sources, the citation of papers, the influencing factors, the H index and the dominant disciplines from natural science and humanistic community. Results The number of scientific papers of “The five” was increased year by year, but the average influence factor and cited quantity were not high. In the scientific papers included in SCIE, Evidence Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine were the most frequent source of publications. In the comparison of dominant subjects, Science of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Integrative & Complementary Medicine was developed well, but Traditional Chinese Medicine was relatively weak. The development of Humanistic community was slow compared with natural science. Conclusion Scientific papers of “The five” should simultaneously guarantee the quality with steady increase in quantity, coordinatively develop disadvantaged subjects and characteristic subjects of Chinese Medicine, further manifest the “The five” comprehensive strength.
李晗 王良滨. 基于Web of Science近十年我国5所中医药大学科技论文文献计量学研究[J]. 中国医药导报, 2018, 15(21): 35-39.
LI Han WANG Liangbin. Bibliometrics of scientific papers of 5 Chinese universities of traditional Chinese medicine based on Web of Science in recent ten years. 中国医药导报, 2018, 15(21): 35-39.