Abstract：Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of interventional therapy for acute lower extremity arterial embolism. Methods From June 2016 to June 2017, in PLA Bethune International Peace Hospital, 60 patients with acute arterial embolism of lower extremity were selected, according to the treatment methods, they were divided into two groups, 30 cases in the control group were treated with large cavity catheter sucking thrombus, and 30 cases in the experiment group were treated with large cavity catheter sucking thrombolytic thrombolysis plus catheter thrombolytic therapy. The treatment effect, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrinogen (FIB) and D-Dimer (D-D) level of the two groups were compared, and the recurrence rate and amputation rate of the two groups were observed. Results After treatment, the total effective rate of experiment group was significantly higher than that of control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After treatment, the levels of APTT and PT in the two groups were higher than those before treatment, and those in the experiment group were significantly higher than those of control group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05), and the levels of FIB and D-D in the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment, and those in the experiment group were significantly lower than those of control group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). After treatment, the incidence of embolic recurrence in the experiment group was lower than that of control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in amputation rate between the experiment group and control group (P > 0.05). Conclusion The clinical effect of large cavity catheter suction thrombolysis plus catheter thrombolysis for patients with acute lower extremity arterial embolization is remarkable, and the complications are few, the clinical effect is better than that of the simple use of large cavity catheter suction thrombolytic therapy, and it can be popularized.
[1] 赵健，刘兆玉，马羽佳，等.大管径导管抽吸血栓治疗急性下肢动脉栓塞的疗效分析[J].医学影像学杂志，2017， 27（8）：1546-1549.
[2] 赵国瑞，任建庄，陈鹏飞，等.急性下肢动脉栓塞导管取栓与支架植入临床疗效对比分析[J].介入放射学杂志，2016，25（10）：853-857.
[3] 王建国，孙沛达，刘海燕，等.动脉取栓术与介入溶栓治疗急性下肢动脉栓塞的复通情况观察[J].中西医结合心血管病杂志：电子版，2017，5（27）：45.
[4] Yang Y，Zhang X，Zhou C，et al. Elevated immunoreactivity of RANTES and CCR1 correlate with the severity of stages and dysmenorrhea in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis [J]. Acta Histochem，2013，115（5）：434-439.
[5] Govatati S，Kodati VL，Deenadayal M，et al. Mutations in the PTEN tumor gene and risk of endometriosis：a case–control study [J]. Hum Reprod，2013，29（2）：324-336.
[6] Chang JH，Au HK，Lee WC，et al. Expression of the pluripotent transcription factor OCT4 promotes cell migration in endometriosis [J]. Fertil Steril，2013，99（5）：1332-1339.
[7] Jowicz AP，Brown JK，McDonald SE，et al. Characterization of the temporal and spatial expression of a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 in the human endometrium and fallopian tube [J]. Reprod Sci，2013，20（11）：1321-1326.
[8] Nepomnyashchikh LM，Lushnikova EL，Molodykh OP，et al. Immunocytochemical analysis of proliferative activity of endometrial and myometrial cell populations in focal and stromal adenomyosis [J]. Bull Exp Biol Med，2013，155（4）：512-517.
[9] Saare M，Soritsa D，Vaidla K，et al. No evidence of somatic DNA copy number alterations in ectopic and ectopic endometrial tissue in endometriosis [J]. Hum Reprod，2012， 27（6）：1857-1864.
[10] Benagiano G，Brosens I. The endometrium in adenomyosis [J]. Womens Health （Lond），2012，8（3）：301-312.
[11] Shaw JL，Horne AW. The paracrinology of tubal ectopic pregnancy [J]. Mol Cell Endocrinol，2012，358（2）：216-222.
[12] van Esch EM，Smeets MJ，Rhemrev JP. Treatment with methotrexate of a cornual pregnancy following endometrial resection [J]. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care，2012，17（2）：170-174.
[13] Canlorbe G，Goubin-Versini I，Azria E，et al. Ectopic decidua：variability of presentation in pregnancy and differential diagnoses [J]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil，2012，40（4）：235-240.
[14] Kodithuwakku SP，Pang RT，Ng EH，et al. Wnt activation downregulates olfactomedin-1 in Fallopian tubal epithelial cells：a microenvironment predisposed to tubal ectopic pregnancy [J]. Lab Invest，2012，92（2）：256-264.
[15] Lee B，Du H，Taylor HS. Experimental murine endometriosis induces DNA methylation and altered gene expression in eutopic endometrium [J]. Biol Reprod，2009，80（1）：79-85.
[16] Fassbender A，Verbeeck N，B?觟rnigen D，et al. Combined mRNA microarray and proteomic analysis of eutopic endometrium of women with and without endometriosis [J]. Hum Reprod，2012，27（7）：2020-2029.
[17] Hu WP，Tay SK，Zhao Y. Endometriosis-specific genes identified by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction expression profiling of endometriosis versus autologous uterine endometrium [J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab，2006，91（1）：228-238.
[18] Hur SE，Lee JY，Moon HS，et al. Angiopoietin-1，angiopoietin-2 and Tie-2 expression in eutopic endometrium in advanced endometriosis [J]. Mol Hum Reprod，2006，12（7）：421-426.
[19] Matsuzaki S，Darcha C. Adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette transporter G2 expression in endometriosis and in endometrium from patients with and without endometriosis [J]. Fertil Steril，2012，98（6）：1512-1520. e3.
[20] Brosens I，Brosens J，Benagiano G. The eutopic endometrium in endometriosis：are the changes of clinical significance [J]. Reprod Biomed Online，2012，24（5）：496-502
2018, Vol. 15 
京公网安备 11010502046598号